[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ANOTHER QUESTION


  • To: "[ tradergirl ]" <tradergirl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: ANOTHER QUESTION
  • From: "Monte C. Smith" <mcs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 06:59:23 -0700
  • In-reply-to: <NABBKIICILGAKIPAGKHFKEDMDAAA.mtepper@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

"Yeah, so?"

Ah, sorry, but this reply is meaningless. Does the "Yeah" part mean you
do view each stock as a separate commodity, and that there are therefore
too many of them to apply a single system to? And does the "SO?" part
indicate that you wish to challenge me, if my view differs from
yours?(That's fine, but I doubt my interest level can support a
prolonged dialog).
(I shouldn't get into this, as I am sure to lose interest in short
time).
I assume we're done now with citizenship issues? (If not, please don't
discuss them with me unless you are prepared for a deafening silence. I
don't give a damn about those issues. If I did, I'd join a suitable
list).

Regards,
Monte

[ tradergirl ] wrote:
> 
> Yeah, so?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Monte C. Smith" <mcs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Omega-List" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 9:19 PM
> Subject: Re: ANOTHER QUESTION
> 
> > Why? Because 'each stock is a different commodity?'
> >
> > [ tradergirl ] wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Brian/Louise Garnant" <babakid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: "[ tradergirl ]" <tradergirl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> >
> > > Thank god I am not a stock investor.
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Monte
> >