|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Did you read your response which follows:
"I don't wish to be argumentative with you, but if you feel so strongly
about
your beliefs then you might want claim the $50,000 reward that Bill Conklin
has put up if you can prove your point against his claims on the validity of
the individuals 5th Amendment rights and the viabilty of not having to file
a return."
Mr. Conklin states claims. Have those claims been upheld by any court in
the US? - NO
So they are just that - claims not facts.
Show us some irrefutable, documented, legal proof that those claims have
been upheld by the courts and then we will lend some credence to your
arguments.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lamont Cranston" <strategies@xxxxxxx>
To: "Tom Bowen" <trbowen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Re:Stop paying taxes
> Tom:
>
> > I will not bore you with my credentials to discuss this matter but I
will
> > tell you that I have spent many years working in the tax field and have
> > thoroughly completed my homework. You, on the other hand, are spouting
> > things that are quite simply not true and it is quite easy to ascertain
> that
> > you have not done your homework. You are interpreting the tax law
> > differently than the ruling bodies and the courts and quite frankly your
> > interpretation does not matter. The ruling bodies and the courts are
the
> > only opinions that matter in any tax case. No one, in the history of
the
> > US, has ever successfully challenged the IRS or the tax laws in a court
of
> > law and been granted immunity from paying income taxes. It would not
> > surprise me one bit if you are visited in the very near future by
> > representatives of our taxing authority if your claim that you do not
pay
> > income taxes is true which I doubt seriously.
>
> I don't wish to be argumentative with you, but if you feel so strongly
about
> your beliefs then you might want claim the $50,000 reward that Bill
Conklin
> has put up if you can prove your point against his claims on the validity
of
> the individuals 5th Amendment rights and the viabilty of not having to
file
> a return.
>
> Lamont
>
>
|