[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: SURVEY RESULT



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

ah, bullshit brian :))....here's one...the "simple" head and shoulders pattern,
 i think even the great french fuzzy programmer said once that this one 
was difficult with ezl ( and i still haven't seen any reliable code for 
it either!!!)....here's another one, divergences....i think dennis h. said 
that were too many time factors involved with the programming to get it 
right. 

so it seems that eyesight viewing charts and human brain interaction are 
still the best "systems" for complex patterns. you might argue that the 
patterns are visually insignificant and "mind" artifacts, but i disagree. 
 the level of programming tools and skills are archaic to "systemize" even 
more complex patterns than those i mentioned above. believe me, i tried 
and spent 10's of thousand of dollars to some of the best programmers i 
could find (incidently,  my best programmer was a red chinese (now us citizen) 
and he could code rings around the best american coders, but he said that 
new programming language would need to be invented to deal with the patterns 
problem)

here's another one...try to program whether any single price is a 1 lot 
or a 1000 lot!!!! big difference. ya can't program it, but it usually leads 
to trends reversals or accelerations and big big profits. a mechanical system 
doesn't know the difference while a systematic discretionary trader with 
a squawk would. big big difference and totally UNPROGRAMMABLE!!!! now i'm 
talking about pit trading, which still represents over 92% of the average 
spoo volume vs 8% average e-mini spoo. another one....knowing the buyers 
and sellers, etc......and on and on....a mechanical system doesn't know 
this shit, while i, a systematic discretionary trader, exercises judgment 
and kicks ass with this very important info.

my point is, is there's a whole lot of important crap that can't be programmed 
and it's the same ole system trader bigoted arrogance to presume that it 
can be. that is, al least now now...........

TJ

and intuition, well, i'll leave that to another time.... :))

At Wed, 1 Mar 2000 21:47:32 -0800, "Brian Massey" <bnm03@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>In fact, I challenge anybody to name 1 thing that can't be programmed. 
 Maybe I'll learn something.