|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Brent,
I agree with what you have said.
A second thought I guess is very important as well: Lots of people are not
willing to show their discreet indicators, parameters, sytems etc. because
they fear, if everybody would trade the same signals it won´t work any
longer. That´s a big mistake. You may have a very successful working
system - I bet that you won´t find a lot of people who are physically able
to trade it. The problem is, not only a fine p&l is important but you must
be able to understand and to trade the signals. So that´s the reason why all
this discreetion is nonsense and everybody needs to find his own way to
trade.
Regards Claus.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: <IndTrader2@xxxxxxx>
An: <pierre.orphelin@xxxxxxxxxx>; <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 6. Februar 2000 17:49
Betreff: Re: Fuzzy Logic NN etc. WAS: Rocket Science
> Interesting charts-Why not produce a web page/email attachment of a
> complete system (fuzzy entries and fuzzy exits) SYSTEM REPORT similar what
M.
> Brown has done. Your charts are always in the market (is this a limitation
of
> the product ?-exits are vitally important as you obviously know). The
fuzzy
> bashing is quite in line with lots of "expert systems" believers and most
of
> the time the bashing is based on a lack of understanding of the topic.
> However, you are trying to sell a product based on something many do not
> understand. M. Brown is not selling anything (yet ;-) however, he provides
> lots of interesting system comments/reports/code etc etc .
>
> I bet you would sell more software if people understood more. Granted, the
> demo is quite nice-however, always being in the market, is not realistic
nor
> wise and qualifing any system without exits is incomplete. These
limitations
> could be dispelled with a minimal mount of work on your side (screen dump
a
> fully fuzzied sys report). This thread in various forms comes and goes in
> various forms-Most people who follow this list are either newbies (who are
> probably under financed to begin with -so they are not really potential
> customers or is preying on the ignorant a sales tactic ??? ) or fairly
> successful (properly financed) systems traders who would gladly improve
> their systems and view the cost of your product as irrelevant. The cost
of
> said product will pay for itself through profits generated.
> I did sales in a "previous life" quite successfully actually and found at
> nearing the final signing/buying if there were a few lose ends (and their
> always is) of A,B&C. I would use the sentence, "If I do A, B and C will
you
> buy the product" ? If they say yes and A,B& C are done, the customer
> usually/always buys the thing as he has already said yes. As dumb as this
> sounds .....you might be surprised to see how few people realize how sales
> are really done.
> Just trying to be objective and helpful.
>
> Brent
>
|