|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Gerald two things I'm better at than trading one is golf the other is
debating. One of the first things you learn about debating is to be able to
take either side of the debate. I once won a debating contest about the
evils of smoking, and big tobacco while smoking.
In your post I could counter every negative thing you said with a positive
truth about President Clinton. Problem with that is I wouldn't get anything
for winning this debate. Secondly I could never change your mind about
Clinton nor do I have a great stake in accomplishing that. Inspite of all
this I like reading your posts on this list. Although I'm on the other side
of the fence on this issue I can appreciate your passion and spirit heck
you probably like Gingrich. That's the great thing about America we will
always fight among ourselves as Americans but join together to defend her
against all others. Happy Fourth of July Gerald and be sure to tune in to
Rush.
Robert
At 10:11 AM 7/4/1999 -0500, Gerald Marisch wrote:
>Robert:
>
>I'll write your inane comments about Komrade Klinton off as the driest of
>humor. No American in their right political mind could ever conceive this
>closet pedophile, this perjurer, this all-but-convicted felon as "...a great
>President".
>
>On the other hand, you may be a died-in-the-wool Democrat liberal with his
>head in political sand or up your a**.
>
>Klinton's administration has been an unabated series of lies, deception and
>Orwellian "double speak". Can anyone forget Klinton's, under-oath,
>perjurous answer of "Depends upon what the definition of 'is' is"?
>
>And can anyone forget the wagging finger and statement, "I did not have sex
>with that woman Monica Lewinsky", that costs $50 million of taxpayers money
>to establish a criminal cover-up and finally find the truth. Oh, I forget,
>that wasn't sex ("It matters how you define 'sex''", Bill Klinton) and a
>person's sex life, even if it wasn't sex, is a private matter.
>
>R-I-I-I-GHT!
>
>Klinton promised the American people no new taxes during a 1992 campaign and
>then implemented 24 new taxes his first elected year.
>
>Recently, Komrade Klinton's administration "found" $1 trillion. Is their
>bookkeeping that inept? I think I just answered my own question. Besides,
>its "legacy-building" time - and to hell with America.
>
>Klinton has been directly or indirectly responsible for the treasonous
>transfer of security secrets to a Communist dictatorship whose long-range
>goal is domination of our Republic. And then Klinton - AGAIN - lies about
>his knowledge of it.
>
>Foreign policy? A total an unmitigated disaster.
>
>Foreign aspirin factories are mistakenly blown up. Foreign consulates are
>"mistakenly" bombed because of faulty maps (and if you believe that one, can
>I interest you in some Whitewater..., eh, excuse me... swamp land?).
>Foreign American embassies - AMERICAN SOIL - and American citizens blown up
>and no military intervention is forthcoming in response. Military troops,
>whose mission is America's defense, are deployed to every third-rate
>country, for THAT country's defense / peacekeeping.
>
>And during some military conflicts, adequate munitions and armament are
>denied our troops, resulting in their bodies being dragged through the
>streets. Oh, you don't remember Somalia??
>
>Maybe we should all send Klinton toy soldiers so he can play "Pretend
>Commander in Chief" while getting oral sex in the oval office. No mother's
>sons or daughters would be killed that way.
>
>Closer to home, let's talk about our economy. When first elected, Klinton
>attempted to take over 1/5 of the American economy through his wife's
>"medi-care" fiasco. The jury is still out on how dismal a failure this
>socialistic endeavor would have been if enacted. Bi-partisanship? Thank
>God bi-parisanship defeated this measure.
>
>OK, Klinton's restored our "failing" economy you say? Our lofty levels of
>the DOW have been achieved not BECAUSE OF Klinton, but IN SPITE OF Klinton.
>His moral depravity pre-occupied him sufficiently to allow the private
>sector to earn profits with minimal government control. Oh, for there to be
>NO GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL, especially under this Klown's watch!
>
>Tax cuts and private-sector initiatives? Now we come to Klinton the thief.
>Steal Republican legislation, claim it as your own and enact it with great
>fanfare.
>
>Shall we go on? We can. But in the interest of not wanting to monopolize
>internet time, email me your arguments. I'll respond publicly so all on
>this list can judge how "great" or treasonously-corrupt is Komrade Klinton.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert W Cummings <robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Alexander Levitin <alevitin@xxxxxxxx>
>Cc: grisham@xxxxxxxxxxx <grisham@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Omega List
><omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date: July 3, 1999 17:39
>Subject: Re: A Thought for the 4th
>
>
>>I think history will find President Clinton judged as a great president.
>>Accusing President Clinton of not treasuring our constitution completely
>>void of any merit. Wondering how somebody who expresses such gratitude for
>>our freedom can also harbor so much hate expressed in found less ridicule.
>>Until the time comes when you have done 1/millionth of what President
>>Clinton has done for his country your critical words will sound very
>>hollow. You simply tell us what you've done for yourself which was
>>interesting but nothing more. I also feel that every President we've had
>>loved his country and guarded our constitution very much even President
>>Nixon. The American public elects and keeps our presidents never under
>>estimate their wisdom.
>>
>>Robert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> How can we have such a president and be happy with him? How our
>>>military could have such commander-in-chief? I do not care if president is
>>>a peanut farmer, actor, grocery shop owner, soldier and likes many women.
>>>But he should treasure the principal of our constitution more then his
>>>life, because the life without such principals is not a life at all. Did
>we
>>>sell our souls for 10,000 on the Dow?
>>>
>>>Alex.
>>
>>
>
>
|