|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I disagree. More exposure, more participants in this list can only be
beneficial to the truth.
My own experience with TradeStation is that while TS4 was an excellent
tool, TS2Ki as initially shipped was very buggy and unusable in a WIN98
environment. TS2Ki SP2 on WINNT is quite useable. There are still some
bugs, perhaps the most annoying of which is the appearance of gaps in the
tick data in a random selection of symbols. Given Omega Research's
performance so far, I'm confident that these bugs will be addressed.
I expect to be using TradeStation more intensively in the future and I
would like to hear from as many other users as possible with stories of
pitfalls as well as useful tricks. TS represents a relatively large
investment of time and money for me and an independent users' forum can
only be helpful. The more participants, the merrier.
When I joined this list, I received an email from jimo@xxxxxxxxxx with a
paragraph on list ettiquette. Rather than try to restrict the number of
participants in this list, it would be better to enforce the more glaring
etiquette violations by unsubscribing the violators after fair warnings are
issued. Perhaps jimo doesn't have the time to do this, but that is what
is necessary to increase the signal to noise ratio on the list.
-uf
At 07:41 PM 6/21/99 +0200, you wrote:
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Charles Kaucher <steinbr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>À : omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Date : lundi 21 juin 1999 03:03
>Objet : More exposure for the Omega List
>
>
> >As a starter, does anyone have the email addresses of the financial
> >analysts who gave buy recommendations on the stock? Should we send them
> >some information about the list and perhaps some posts of recent users of
> >their new product?
> >
>
>Usual blackmail technique that is the rule on this list.
>Congratulations:
>You are in progress, but wrong direction.
>
>Instead of pushing Omega users by providing false news that I am tired to
>fight and allowing MB delirium without doing anything to maintain the
>expected minimum serious level that was never achieved, you should ask
>yourself about your sheriff function on this list.
>
>Try to count the number of pure technical contributor that have left this
>list over 4 years:
>I 'll give you the names, if your memory fail.
>
>Then we could speak on more exposure.
>For the moment the problem is: "less exposure".
>
>This list is obviously headed by people who do not like Omega Research and
>present it as a helpful tool for the newbies.
>This should be also obvious to anyone, even for bashers.
>
>In fact , it allows more and more confusion because of the lack of moral
>integrity of those who should act to calm the waters when necessary.
>
>Have you ( you the authorities) fixed a misinformation of any basher on
>this list ?:
>NEVER..
>I did it dozens of times.
>Is it the proof that I was wrong ?
>No, because none here has been able to prove that I was wrong.
>
>It's only the proof that you ae biased and that the goal of this list is
>not what it seems to be.
>
> >Any other ideas out there?
> >
>
>Yes:
>
>CLOSE THIS LIST if you are not able of a minimum of impartiality.
>
>It's more and more a shame to read what read all the day long.
>
>If you are not able to use TradeStation, change your occupation to
>something at your level, and let the serious users to have the normal
>discussion that they cannot have by filtering a lot of trash , and reading
>sempiternal replies of the same psychotic individals that maks more
>than 50 % of the traffic of this electronic dustbin.
>
>If you were making money with TradeStation on the market, I guess that you
>would not have the same attitude.
>You do not ?
>
>So why to bother us with this stupid revenge attitude?
>
>If you do not respect yourself ( suffice to read the list) how could you
>expect that we could respect you ?
>
>PO
|