|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Here, here Lynn! With as many problems that plague Omega and TS2K, I cannot
afford the time to mess around with operating systems, bug fixes, and calls
to Omega to get my software running and stable enough to trade. My
livelihood depends on serious trading, not playing around with the latest
software. This is a business not my hobby. I question how a serious
daytrader can earn a living if he has to spend a good amount of his time
playing with software just to get it up and running much less dependable. I
know how busy I am during the trading day and I sure don't have the time to
do anything but watch the market, constantly evaluate, and then trade
accordingly. I would not be surprised to find the "majority" of TS2K users
to be either EOD users or daytrader wanna-be's. Notice I said "majority".
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: <MRLYNNG@xxxxxxx>
To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 1999 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: TS2k NT speed
> In a message dated 6/12/99 1:33:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> jsnowden@xxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << Many days charting quits updating once during the day and I try
> editing data in the GS, if that doesn't work I close charting and open
> it again. This only takes a few seconds per workspace certainly less
> than one minute per workspace with no loss of data. I was out of town
> Monday and Tuesday and left the GS running and charting off and was
> happy to see no loss of data when I opened charting. It did crash a few
> minutes later, but restarted GS and TS and it was ok. This takes less
> than three minutes with one workspace. Support or no support I would
> consider NT if you are willing to do all the work to change over. >>
> *****************************
> Jim:
> I'm sorry but as a daytrader what you describe in a horrible mess. I
agree
> that NT may be a more stable platform but to operate TS under those
> circumstances would be a real pain for me. Unless TS becomes more stable
I
> cannot consider a change from TS 4.0. Just my opinion.
> Lynn
>
|