|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I believe you know exactly what I'm talking about. if you posted the exact
trades that you have made on a one lot basis you would have been broke using
aberration. it is an aberration that you were "maybe" able to catch a large
trend in something with a large enough size. and that helped offset the
losers. in that case what you are doing still is gambling, you say you
took two years with a hundred and fifty grand to do what I "may" have been
to do at the roulette table in Vegas in three hours. how do you consider
what you have done scientific or credible and how do you expect it to
continue?
I watched a show the other night about Vegas and there was this Greek guy
who almost busted the horse shoe casino. after starting with 10,000 he
quickly won over 20 million dollars. he is busted now, and has nothing. I
would be very interested in see the exact trade by trade results of what you
claim to have done, including the size you traded on what. the worst thing
that could happen is that I will be wrong in my assessment of your gambling
and I will wind up begging that you mentor me.
time and time again I have seen guys who have had a run come on the list and
make these claims. where are they all now? gone like the Vegas gambler,
back to reality land. to assume that one can maintain a vertical equity
curve will soon flip over from gravitational pull. but everyone needs
something to believe in and so here we are.
mb
ps less confused than you think.
> Poor Mark Brown has gotten confused.
|