|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I agree. Unfortunately, I can't afford to buy anything else at this
point. I've been using Signal 4.1 as my primary charting tool and keeping
only the few charts that I think need watching in more detail up on
TS2Ki. The fewer charts I have open in TS2Ki, the less frequent the
crashes.
I'm amazed that OMGA's stock price is holding up. Aren't OMGA's
investors watching this list?
I think it behooves OmegaResearch to develop and publicize a plan to get
this product working at least as well as TS4 was working real soon now or
they will quickly lose credibility.
Who keeps giving them all those "best trading software of the year award"?
TS4 was finally working as advertised for me when I was essentially forced
to upgrade by BMI who cut of Canadian data feeds to TS4 at the end of
April. But even to get TS4 working reasonably well, I had to upgrade
to 64 MB of RAM and P-200, considerably above the alleged min. config of
32M, P-90 for TS4.
-uf
At 11:41 AM 5/21/99 -0700, fpi@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>At 10:06 AM 5/21/99 -0500, you wrote:
> >i should just sell my program now, forget fixing the bugs. everyone would
> >love it, i could latter hook it up to a data feed i guess and no one would
> >notice. please send life's savings to : mb
>
>****Isn't that the truth? I'm absolutely astounded by some of the posts of
>the TS2000 bravehearts who struggle on with the program in its current state.
>
>Have they considered what their time is worth? If they do, they'll discover
>that TS2000 is the most expensive software they'll probably ever buy.
>
>It would be one thing if it increased functionality, but to read about the
>"excitement" of only crashing once a day (how many times does one need to
>crash to ruin their intraday data for the day?), having a workspace open
>with half a chart in it, collecting 5 symbols simultaneously--all for
>thousands of dollars & untold wasted hours of their irretrievable time--is
>almost beyond belief.
>
>TS2000 should be renamed TB2000 for True Believers.
>
>My hat is off to you folks, because perhaps at some point TS2000 will be
>usable, due in no small measure to your efforts to persist with it. I just
>don't know how you can afford the time to do it. Isn't there more to life,
>or SHOULD be?
>
>Best of luck,
>
>FPI
> >
> >
> >
> >> Huh ?
> >>
> >> SP2 appears to be a MAJOR improvement.
> >>
> >> The data is lagging behind still, but only 5-10 seconds behind TS4.0.
> >
> >
> >ps must have been the phone call..yea.
> >
> >
> >
Ullrich Fischer
|