|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Well - it appears that you can post on this mail list.
I don't know who you think I am - but I'm just a long term inhabitant of cyberspace
who's hanging around this mail list to try to get some ideas about getting my trading
software Y2K compliant.
And I do read every message that's posted to this list when I'm subscribing to it
(sometimes I'm on - sometimes I'm off - right now I'm on). So I've read every message
in your "food fight thread".
I'm no particular friend of anyone on this list - including Mr. Brown - or you for that
matter (although I don't think I have any particular enemies either). Having been on
line for such a long time - I simply don't get all bent out about on-line personality
conflicts anymore. Been there - done that - and I'm bored to death with those kinds of
things at this point.
And I do get that Omega magazine in the mail - as well as (I think it's called) Futures
Magazine (guess that's because I'm an Omega customer - because I've never subscribed to
either). And when someone reminded me who you were - I can't deny that I've seen your
name in both publications.
Keeping all of this in mind - you still haven't answered my question. What do you
think of TS2000? You apparently write/sell software add-ons/systems/indicators -
whatever you want to call them - for this program - and I think you should - at a
minimum - have an opinion about it.
Also keep in mind that I'm a lawyer - and don't have any problems asking the same
question a couple of dozen times until I get an answer to my question. It's kind of
boring asking the same question again and again - but I'm used to the routine with a
reluctant witness. Robyn
Tom DeMark wrote:
> ms. greene,
>
> i feel compelled to respond to my second hand receipt of your email
> communications.
>
> unfortunately, it appears that you were not privy to the misdirected
> e-mail to my son which errantly reached this site. obviously, you were
> skeptical as were a handful of others. despite the suspicions of this
> small group, most members accepted this unintended one time trip as an
> accident and sent numerous kind words.
>
> i was surprised to receive an apology from one of your most esteemed
> members, mr mark brown, for some of the disparaging remarks and
> unjustified claims of marketing and promotion which he intially made in
> response to my error. as mark is aware,and as were other perceptive
> members, i never intended to e-mail this group, i had absolutely NOTHING
> to sell or promote, and made NO representations regarding market
> forecasts to this group whatsover, blatant or subtle. the intended
> recipient of this correspondence was obviously my son.
>
> to soothe any ruffled feathers which may have occurred as a result of my
> error, despite the fact that we immediately sent a notice to that effect
> to the group, i agreed to share with those interested members the
> process by which i derived the daily projections for last friday as well
> as other research oriented questions they may have had.the members to
> whom i communicated were most appreciative.
>
> on a secondary level, mr. brown took it upon himself to create a web
> site for members to contact me should they desire. unfortunately, this
> was done without my prior knowledge and when mark and i discussed this
> generous gesture, i indicated to him that before i consider proceeding i
> must discuss this matter with my business partners, as well as my
> attorneys regarding rules and regulations.
>
> now you are asking me to comment on software since you believe that i am
> a promoter and distributor of software myself. to set the record
> straight one more time on any misperceived beliefs of my promtion of
> goods or services, i have NEVER received any income from any
> seminar--occasionally i will receive reimbursement of travel expenses
> and hotel--nor income from the expert commentary on the Omega
> products--yes, that is right depite what all the critics of tom demark
> on your site may say and believe to be otherwise. finally, people claim
> that i derived big income from futures magzine for having written
> articles--nonsense, i am paid just nominally enuff for them to obtain
> copyright ownership and then i gave this few hundred-yes hundred $
> away.finally, the royalties and income from my books--once again the few
> critics are wrong--it would be difficult to live off the small % of the
> wholesale dollars of the books that i receive from my publisher or to
> donate this meager amount of money to a charity.
>
> if any of the critics are referring to a campaign to sell videotapes of
> tom demark, my attys stopped the sale of the tapes since the promotion
> materials were released without our approval. this precluded the
> marketers from earning revenues in excess of one million.
>
> i hope this sets the record straight once and for all i am not selling
> any software or systems and that i never have.i have enjoyed sharing my
> research ideas with others in the past but in no uncertain terms can any
> member of this site EVER claim that my communications were promtional in
> any sense.
>
> hopefully, this will set the record straight once and for all and prove
> to those detractors that they misrepresenting the truth regarding me and
> my activities.
>
> since i am precluded from posting to the forum, i do not object your
> forwarding this communication to the members and to embarrass those
> indivudals who have made slanderous and untruthful statements regarding
> me in the past.
>
> best regards,
>
> tom demark
|