|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Message-ID: <36F6BC0F.1B5EDBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:54:23 -0600
From: Paula <hotair003@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Projects
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: fpi@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TS2k upgrade and y2k patch
References: <3.0.6.32.19990322142530.00999860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The thing that makes me nervous is s people are getting many different
stories.
Doesn't Omega have a policy that can be printed re: these issues of password
etc? What if they change their
minds at any one point about any of this and set another unwritten policy. In
my naivete I don't understand why the Y2K patch is not just posted to their
website as Metastock does. Its a heck of alot easier.
Paula
fpi@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Dear Gregory:
>
> You wrote:
>
> If Omega's records show that I have TS2k, I will not be eligible
> for the TS4.0 y2k patch. I will be eligible for the patch if I
> "return" TS2k. Omega's policy does not allow TS4.0 and TS2k to
> run on the same machine. Presumably, Omega feels running on two
> machines requires two licenses.
>
> The TS4.0 y2k patch is not free(!), but the price has not yet been
> announced. The patch will also be fingerprinted to my machine(!),
> and under password control. (I don't know if the password is good
> "for life".)
>
> Your post prompted me to call Omega concerning the above.
>
> The sales rep I talked to said you could get a Y2K patch for TS4 even if
> you have upgraded to TS2000i.
>
> He said the charge for the patch would probably be S&H.
>
> He said he noted on my account that I am to receive a Y2K patch.
>
> He also said they're not sent out automatically, so it seems once the patch
> is available, you must call Omega and request it.
>
> Would appreciate others feedback on their experiences in regards to getting
> a Y2K patch after having upgraded to TS2000i.
>
> Regards,
>
> FPI
|