|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 13:32:22 -0600
>From: Robert W Cummings <robert.cummings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Mark Jurik <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: "'code-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <code-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "'omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx'" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> "'_Norman Smith'" <nfsmith@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: CL_Adaptive moving avg.
>Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990307133222.007b3350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>So in others words the free lookers didn't buy so you decided that wasn't
>good for you.
>You felt it better for the public to buy then be stuck with your indicator
>if they didn't like or couldn't use them. I see why you call it a business
>decision. Here's an idea if your satisfaction rate is 95.5 as you claim
>then offer a money back offer during a limited trial period and have a 100%
>satisfaction rate.
>Robert
Robert,
With all due respect to Mark Jurik, I do not know anything about the
Jurik MA and therefore have no opinion on it. It could very well be the best
investment you could ever made. What I do know is that in my marketing class
in college I learned that when given a choice, sometimes people will think the
higher prized item are better and therefore buy it ! Consider the following-
which would you think are better ???
Prefume A $ free
Prefume B $ 2
Prefume C $ 29.95
System A $ free
System B $ 50
System C $ 250
System D $ 30,000
Surprise !!!!!!!!!!! They are all the same- I just put it in a different
package. Sorry, no refund- remember our agreement ?
Personally, if I had something that works, I wouldn't sell it, write a
book, or give any seminars. What I would do is let you try it for free and
you pay me when you feel that you benefitted from it. I would let God be my
enforcer. Isn't there an old saying that " if you cheat someone, you are not
going to benefit from it " ??? Just look around and see.
|