[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cleaning up the Omega list



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Rose wrote:
"Discuss subjects that do not fall into the scope of these individuals
>narrow minds."

Hey Rose, I got your narrow mind hanging!!!

Contribute something really usefulf or a change.  That's about 10
trash-level posts now.  We're waiting.

Brian.


-----Original Message-----
From:	Michael Stewart [mailto:MPST@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:	Sunday, November 15, 1998 1:46 PM
To:	rosalee@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc:	Omega
Subject:	Re: Cleaning up the Omega list

Rose Lee,

Stop.  Rewind.   Read your digests (for the first time).  All those you
mention below and MB make significant contributions to this list - if you
don't have anything useful to say why bother until you do?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------

>
>To: Members of the Omega list, OmegaResearch Staff and other readers
>
>This list is a vehicle for the some people to vent their frustration on
>others by ridiculing and insulting those who they do not know, like, agree
>with, or discusses something they may not like or understand.
>
>While I have been reading the digests elsewhere I have noted that you are
in
>trouble if you:-
>1 Have a UK hotmail address, or one not of US origin.
>2 Appear to be of European origin e.g. Esser, Orphelin, Ekyn et al.
>3 Don't agree with, support and kow tow to Massey, Brown, Tradejack, et al
>4 Make comments that the above individuals do not subscribe too.
>5 Discuss subjects that do not fall into the scope of these individuals
>narrow minds.
>6 Do not make comments that meet the criteria of few.
>
>These outrageous attacks even extend to publishing documents from others on
>personal websites. (Yes, I have very good contacts and information. You do
>not know my race colour or creed. A maiden name and a UK email address is
>not a good hook on which to hang labels). Unlike some, I do not advertise
my
>company or its websites after my name. Neither do I suck in newbies and
then
>try and sell them systems. My systems sell themselves.
>
>It is easy to filter out the trash but we should not need to. Comments from
>Jim Osborn like .... while Mark was obviously rude and insensitive in his
>reaction .. are a sign of weak ineffectual management. If Brown is being
>rude to other members of the list then he should be unsubscribed.
>
>I have received a number of emails which contain the same sentiments as
this
>part reply
>>>>>  Great Post, and very good comments. I agree 1000% with you. ..... I
>would help out more on the list, but I have been bashed so much by this nut
>case, I stopped.    <<<<<
>
>It is time that the silent majority got off their butts and spoke out, not
>only privately but publicly. Its time for the list managers to do
something.
>We could have a useful productive list.
>
>Get rid of the trash.
>Manage the list properly.
>Lets talk usefully and productively.
>
>If this list continues to be run , organised and continues to operate as it
>does .... no way ...... I going to make no contribution .... my staff will
>filter out the rubbish and we will use the rest.... we win a little bit of
>free useful info. We all lose a lot of useful contributions.
>
>Rosalind Lee
>