|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dans un courrier daté du 12/11/98 17:18:29 Heure d5iver Pari29 Madrid,
bnm03@xxxxxxx a écrit :
> Pierre,
>
> You will learn my French non-programming firend that CPU time doesn't
matter
> 1 bit in code like this - in most EL code. The bottom line is getting it
> done. I wouldn't want you programming for me beause your useless attention
> to trivial detail costs me money and wastes me time. Get a clue. This
rules
> is readability first then CPU time if it matters at all which it useally
> doesn't. This isn't assembly language programming and there's nothing
> iterative here to slow the PC down. Being the keen-eyed Elton John type
you
> are (now I really know you must spend more time practicing you instruments
> than writing code) I would expect that you would actually notice a
> millsecond or two difference in the time it takes for my pentium II to
> execute the extra statements. Unfortunately, your attention to detail is
> not usefulin this case because this is such a small function. I also have
> iterative code the solves the same thing. It gets the job done and it gets
> it done well.
>
Yes, but it was not clever.
I like to take a chance of some educational proper EL programming, even to
you.
Mostly to you these times, should I write...
> iRawPrice = 0 is good defensive programming weather it needs to be there or
> not because god knows Omega EL is quirky enough. If you were a programmer
> you'd know this.
>
This is perfectly useless in this case.
This line can be seen as a reset of the iRawPrice variable at each bar.
You have no valid reason to do this here because the next line, this variable
is replaced by the ROC based calculation, that does not make use of a previous
value of itself.
Omega EL is not so quirky, and not at a point where you feel enforced to reset
a variable to zero without any reason. This protects nothing, excepted
yourself agiast your fears, because you are not confident into the software,
but that's another story.
> Reading yours....
>
> God Pierre in your attempt to quickly criticize without thinking -- SO
> TY[ICAL OF YOUR BLIND AFFLICATION -- YOU WILL REALZIE THAT THIS CODE WAS
NOT
> MEANT TO BE PLOTTED!!!!!!!!!! A PLOT OFTHIS CODE IS USELESS YOU PIN HEAD.
>
> GET A F--IN CLUE!
>
Bad education and typical reaction of a "Mr I know All".
The solution that I proposed can be plotted too. You never mention in your
post that is should not.
> DO TRADERS REALLY TRUST YOUR EURO-FUZZY P.O.S. SOFTWARE?
>
J' comprends pas.
Vous n'avez qu'à l'essayer, c'est gratuit.
> THIS IS A FUNCTION THAT I USE IN A LARGER SYSTEM TO CREATE A TEXT FILE.
THE
> VALUE THAT THIS FUNCTION RETURNS IS WRITTEN TO A TEXT FILE THEN AN EXCEL
VBA
> PROGRAM CREATES A TRADESHEET FOR ME PRINTING THIS VALUE.
>
Not documented in your post.
My point was to focus on good EL programming.
> If I thought your suggestions had any merit Pierre I'd be the first to
> complement you . BUT ALL OF THEM ARE NITS LIKE SO MCUH OF YOUR CRAP
DOESN'T
> AMOUNT TO A HILL OF BEANS. ADDING YOUR SUGGESTIONS WOULD MAKE AOBSOLUTELY
> NO DIFFERENCE IN THE TIME OR OUTPUT OF THIS FUNCTION.
>
It's not a valid reason to shout.
A good practice is to recognize when you are wrong.
Only this can produce the respect that you may deserve.
> THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT 3.5 YEARS AGO I NEEDED A SOLUTION AND THIS WORKS
> WELL I MIGHT ADD.
>
Yes...it works.
> SO GO TO SCHOOL HERE PIERRE BECAUSE YOU'LL LEARN THAT IN AMERICA WE
ACTUALLY
> THINK BEFORE WE BASH AND ASK OURSELVES IF THERE'S A GOOD REASON FOR IT.
>
I know of perfect suckers in any country, including mine.
> GO BACK INTO THE HOLE YOU CRAWLED OUT OF HERE BECAUSE YOU'RE OUT OF YOUR
> LEAGUE MY FRENCH NON PROGRAMMING FRIEND.
>
Yes, but I'm polite.
> Go back to writing your stupid little indicators and crappy web pages and
> leave the real programming to professionals like me.
>
Woah...
Do you really think what you write ?
I do not ask for proofs...
-Pierre Orphelin
|