|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I would not mind reading newsletters at no charge. It does give you a type
of consensus. However, Tom and I will both be gone by October 31st so you
folks can get back to your server problems and data glitches.Thanks for the
memories...really, -----Original Message-----
From: Phil Lane <logical@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: tabanna <tabanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, October 26, 1998 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: We were right again blah blah
>At 07:28 PM 10/26/98 +0300, you wrote:
>>Phil ~ , CNBC is one thing. Peterson is not in the same class.
>
>Do you have any reason in particular to think so? Seems like more double
>talk to me.
>The fact is my "backtested" paintbars kick butt on this kind of so-called
>analysis. But I'm not going around inflicting my views on others. I could
>tell you about whatever prediction came true, but what would be the point?
>
>>this matter has already been discussed.
>>
>
>But not resolved. He said he was going away, and the list was like a breath
>of fresh air for a while. If you actually find this stuff to be of value
>there are innumerable lists devoted to it. You can follow it there.
>
>How'd you guys like it if I invited every talking head I could find to join
>the Omega list? How about all the Dow-Guessers on the Wall Street Week
>show. How about Elaine Garzarelli? Or Pretcher? We could get about 20 or 30
>of them. Basically it would ruin the list.
>
|