PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
>Subject: Re: We were right again blah blah
> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:51:05 -0800
> From: Phil Lane <logical@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "tabanna" <tabanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>At 07:28 PM 10/26/98 +0300, you wrote:
>>Phil ~ , CNBC is one thing. Peterson is not in the same class.
>
>Do you have any reason in particular to think so? Seems like more >double talk to me. The fact is my "backtested" paintbars kick butt on >this kind of so-called analysis. But I'm not going around inflicting >my views on others.
Yes, you are, Phil, constantly. (Though not as much as UMCane01).
This list is mostly opinion, and too much of it is opinion about others
on the list, not about trading. But you only object to opinions about
trading. You're weird.
Keep posting, Neil.
don
|