|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dans un courrier daté du 23/10/98 17:29:09é Pari9 Madrid,
dlmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :
>
snip
>
> Quite obviously, none of Omega's Board of Directors are subscribers to
> this List. If they were, I'm absolutely certain that they would never
> allow Omega to ignore such a large group of customers. Perhaps, JimO
> might consider sending these folks a complimentary subscription to the
> List. Does anyone have their e-mail addresses? Do these people even
> have e-mail addresses?
>
They are subscriber.
> If I were the lawyers in the Class Action suit which MB posted at his
> Web site, I'd drag every one of these people into court, put them on the
> stand, and ask them point-blank, in front of a common-sense jury,
> precisely why they allowed Omega to be managed in such a fashion that
> they lost literally thousands of once-loyal customers.
>
> The impending Class Action lawsuit against Omega is not near as much a
> technical-issues matter as Pierre would want you all to believe; it's
> much more a management issue. Were Omega competently managed, the vast
> majority of technical issue SYMPTOMS would never have become a
> problem...they'd have been delt with long ago rather than being allowed
> to fester and drive Omega customers away in hoards.
>
The Class action suit is a mix of technical issues (most are wrong) and
management, ths drst one serving as a proof of the misfunction of the second
one.
> We'd all, for example, be sitting here today happier than Pigs in Po-Po
> with TS4 Y2K patches installed on our computers...showering heaps of
> praise on Bill Cruz and Company for the wonderful job they were all
> doing.
Pigs are clever than Omega bashers.
They do no claim their Yk2 soybeans and and satisfied with the current feed.
snip
>
> Pierre's correct: if all we do is continue to complain TO THE LIST...we
> should all sign up for psychiatric assistance. I think Bill Cruz
> figured out long ago that if that's all we did then we'd be
> "well-contained" and, hence, no "real" problem. He's absolutely right.
>
> Time to break out of the box.
>
> Dave
>
OK.
Go out of the box and explain all of this to the Court.
This is not the purpose of this list doing no more than lobbying.
Rgds,
Dr P.
>
|