[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: In defense of Omega Support


  • To: <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: In defense of Omega Support
  • From: "T-BONkkkkkkk" <T-BONkkkkkkkkMSNkkkM>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 07:04:59 -0400 (EDT)

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Peter

I really feel for your frustration over the pathetic retort you have had,
daring to suggest that Omega's Technical Department were helpful.  I have no
doubt that when you contacted them you were pleasant and polite and they
responded accordingly.  If those who are so loud and rude on this list acted
in the same way as you, perhaps they might start to get somewhere with their
problems - and maybe even with their trading.  Have you noticed, it is
always the empty barrels that make most noise?

Bill Eykyn


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter2150@xxxxxxx <Peter2150@xxxxxxx>
To: omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, October 10, 1998 6:03 am
Subject: Re: In defense of Omega Support


>In a message dated 98-10-09 18:48:25 EDT, editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> A ha!  Gotcha!  You must be an Omega Research employee, acting under an
>>  alias, being paid by the company to post messages of support!  Your real
>>  name must be Joe Krutsinger!  No one else would post such a message.
(Are
>>  you the one who has been wearing the Joe Krutsinger disguises and
>>  impersonating me at various trading-related events?)
>
>Sorry, but I find this type of response STUPID.  Sure I've had some
problems
>early on with Omega's tech support, but the last time I had a problem they
>were excellent. (and no I am not an employee).   Of course if I were in
Tech
>Support, and got a call from someone with an attitude like that, I probably
>wouldn't bother being to helpful either
>