|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Lying to a grand jury about sex doesn't qualify as an impeachable offense.
It is perjury but is it impeachable? Is not a legal forum we have but a
political one especially in the absent of crimes of a criminal intent. Its
still about sex and sin.
Robert
At 02:56 AM 9/13/98 -0400, Gaius Marius wrote:
>>Even the perjury charges are not valid because
>>Clinton is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and I repeat that
>>is yet to be even though its obvious.
>
>
>You've got to be kidding !!
>
>He went to a grand jury (as well as a legal deposition) and said he didn't
>have sex with Monica Lewinsky. How did his semen get on her dress? It
>spontaneously blew out of his penis, went through several layers of his
>pants and then landed randomly on her dress??
>
>Come on. That's lying to a grand jury. That's perjury. And what's with all
>this legal machinations on the definition of sex?
>
>And now he's saying that oral sex is not sex? Heck, if oral sex is not sex,
>then why is the word sex in the phrase "oral sex"? And if a 50ish year old
>guy who went through the sixties and had a daughter with his wife does not
>know what is sex and what is not, what in the world is he doing as President
>of this country? And don't tell me his daughter was conceived by immaculate
>conception because he is not God.
>
>As for going to court, well, that's what impeachment is for. That's the only
>way a sitting President can be put on trial.
>
>And I say trial the bastard. He took an oath to uphold and defend the
>Constitution. He's the chief law enforcement officier. And he lied to a
>federal grand jury, as well as in a deposition. A deposition is considered
>to be the same as being on the witness stand, where you raise your right
>hand and swear to tell the truth, the hold truth and nothing but the truth,
>so help you God.
>
>Apparently, to Bill Clinton, the truth is relative...depends on his
>interpretations .....
>
>
>
>
|