[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]:Searching the Starr report



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

>
>oh yeah forgot to address this issue concerning Jones, if they had a case
they would have already filed.
Point of Monica is still irreverent to Jones as the judge ruled before
because Monica's was consensual sex. Judge Susan Wright was only letting
Clinton know she didn't like it will not act on the perjury, again the TV
lawyers.
Robert
>
>At 05:08 PM 9/12/98 -0400, Sentinel Trading wrote:
>>
>>If this statement is any indication (to wit the last  sentence) there may be
>>more.  Also the grand jury may indict on any of the charges it sees fit
>that is
>>out of Starrs' hands and up to the jury. Also the judge in the Jones case
has
>>grounds for contempt, in her court, and I believe she is already considering
>>these charges, and may reverse her self, in the Jones dismissal.
>>
>>
>>