|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Robert W Cummings wrote:
>
> >
> >oh yeah forgot to address this issue concerning Jones, if they had a case
> they would have already filed.
> Point of Monica is still irreverent to Jones as the judge ruled before
> because Monica's was consensual sex. Judge Susan Wright was only letting
Monica is not irrelevant, precisely because under the federal sexual
harrassment guidelines Clinton is guilty because she is a subordinate,
consensual or not. Remember the woman B52 pilot who had consensual sex
with an enlisted man. I bet she wishes that Clinton's phony legal
opinions would have gotten her off the hook.
> Clinton know she didn't like it will not act on the perjury, again the TV
> lawyers.
> Robert
> >
> >At 05:08 PM 9/12/98 -0400, Sentinel Trading wrote:
> >>
> >>If this statement is any indication (to wit the last sentence) there may be
> >>more. Also the grand jury may indict on any of the charges it sees fit
> >that is
> >>out of Starrs' hands and up to the jury. Also the judge in the Jones case
> has
> >>grounds for contempt, in her court, and I believe she is already considering
> >>these charges, and may reverse her self, in the Jones dismissal.
> >>
> >>
> >>
|