|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Well according to the TV lawyers that's a Huge maybe and used when you give
sin instead of crime.
If Starr had more he would have already given it, but I hope your wrong we
need to move on.
Robert
At 05:08 PM 9/12/98 -0400, Sentinel Trading wrote:
>
>If this statement is any indication (to wit the last sentence) there may be
>more. Also the grand jury may indict on any of the charges it sees fit
that is
>out of Starrs' hands and up to the jury. Also the judge in the Jones case has
>grounds for contempt, in her court, and I believe she is already considering
>these charges, and may reverse her self, in the Jones dismissal.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>2. Current Status of the Investigation. When the OIC's jurisdiction was
expanded
>to cover the Lewinsky matter in January 1998, several matters remained under
>active investigation by this Office. Evidence was being gathered and
evaluated
>on, among other things, events related to the Rose Law Firm's
representation of
>Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan Association; events related to the firings in
>the White House Travel Office; and events related to the use of FBI files.
Since
>the current phase of the investigation began, additional events arising
from the
>Lewinsky matter have also come under scrutiny, including possible perjury and
>obstruction of justice related to former White House volunteer Kathleen
Willey,
>and the possible misuse of the personnel records of Pentagon employee Linda
>Tripp.
>
>>From the outset, it was our strong desire to complete all phases of the
>investigation before deciding whether to submit to Congress information -- if
>any -- that may constitute grounds for an impeachment. But events and the
>statutory command of Section 595(c) have dictated otherwise. As the
>investigation into the President's actions with respect to Ms. Lewinsky
and the
>Jones litigation progressed, it became apparent that there was a significant
>body of substantial and credible information that met the Section 595(c)
>threshold. As that phase of the investigation neared completion, it also
became
>apparent that a delay of this Referral until the evidence from all phases
of the
>investigation had been evaluated would be unwise. Although Section 595(c)
does
>not specify when information must be submitted, its text strongly suggests
that
>information of this type belongs in the hands of Congress as soon as the
>Independent Counsel determines that the information is reliable and
>substantially complete.
>
>All phases of the investigation are now nearing completion. This Office will
>soon make final decisions about what steps to take, if any, with respect
to the
>other information it has gathered. Those decisions will be made at the
earliest
>practical time, consistent with our statutory and ethical obligations.
>
>
|