[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Concluions: Rethinking the 2% MM rule...



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Brian;

Very professional and informative post concerning risk can't imagine
anybody not gaining from reading it I know I have thanks.

Robert


>This thread has been good for me because it has confirmed my belief, that 
>FOR ME the 2% is not valid.  It's too constrictive and too limiting to 
>trade futures markets with.  Futures markets involve huge amounts of 
>leverage which by definition involve more risk.  I do not trade a system 
>though I have an approach that is consistent.  My entries are determined by 
>how much risk I think there is (support/resistance).  Position size is 
>based on how likely I think success is or what the probability failure is. 
> If it's low, I go in bigger, if it's high, I trade small looking to 
>pyramid if I'm right.  I like to pyramid because I already have the markets 
>money in hand.  While I haven't done the math, I find that I don't like to 
>risk more than 200-500/contract.  This figure has evolved because I know it 
>is relatively easy to quickly get it back.  I would rather take several 
>small losses than one large one because psychologically it's easier to 
>continue trading and I know my history of, at worst, 33% (1 in 3) trades 
>working out.  I am looking to quantify my approach a little more thus the 
>thread.
>
>
>I hope that this has given new traders food for thought.  I wish I had had 
>this when I started.
>
>DISCALIMER: If I've misunderstood or misrepresented anything here I 
>apologize.
>
>
>Good Trading,
>Brian.
>
>
>
>
>