|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Not that I want to defend Omega or anything, but it wouldn't be the
first time that a software company missed a target release date. This
doesn't necessarily mean dishonesty or bad faith. And am I missing
something? Do we really need the Y2K patch right now??
> Janette, yes you have posted on the list in the past that the patch
> would be made after you have
> attempted to force everyone of us to buy the 5.0 upgrade first! You
> also sent the statement below to
> the list. Saying that the year 2000 patch would be available for
> download early second quarter 98.
> Regardless of what you now say you did make that statement publicly
> and as a company representative!
> How can I have any confidence at all as a client of yours? Only after
> the exposure of the beta 5.0
> not being year 2000, did you send out your unofficial spokesman the
> only so called y2000 compliant
> 5.0 beta in existence. Very fishy, two things : I have a memory and
> I'm not dumb! You have a
> responsibility to me, you don't want me to transfer my license
> agreement of your product by selling
> it second hand to someone and you don't want to fix the faulty
> software so I can use it. Have you
> the nerve to force me to pay more so I can use what I have paid for
> already? Do me a favor! Go tell
> Bill and Ralph that it would be good public relations to whip out a
> y2000 patch for 4.0 so we future
> and option traders don't go elsewhere during the time you are dragging
> your feet getting 5.0 out the
> door. Maybe and just maybe you will have some customers left, so you
> can sell some 5.0's to existing
> clients. Ever heard of a repeat customer? It's a profitable concept.
> Below is the letter you sent
> promising the y2000 4.0 patch early second quarter 98...
|