|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Pierre and all others,
If the Beta od 5.0 is not Y2K compliant, then the design of 5.0 is not Y2K
compliant, and at this point, they will have to 'PATCH' their design to make it
complant. This is not good. In fact designing a product to be released in 1998
not Y2K ready is the # 1 item on the DUMMY LIST. I more than likely will not be
going to 5.0 any time soon if ever, for reasons like this. I have no confidence
in Omega to do what the customer is asking for.
John
Orphelin@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Dans un courrier daté du 27/06/98 17:07:50 , vous avez écrit :
>
> <<
> Mr. Orphelin, they "Omega" also announced the following! So which
> statement are we to believe? I need the patch or 5.0 right now! In fact
> I rather want the patch because I do not believe Omega's 5.0 will be
> y2000 the beta is not and I could not believe that they will rewrite and
> rebeta the 5.0 in time to do many of us futures traders any good. I
> believe many option traders are also feeling the crunch too. Given the
> historical track record of Omega, I am very skeptical that Omega has
> made a diversionary post on the anniversary of the y2000 patch promise.
> Please excuse me for being worried but I am out of time to have this
> matter resolved. I too will sell my TradeSatation for 1000.00 with
> OptionStation and WinBeep, today if someone wants it.
> >>
>
> TS5 will be Yk2 compliant after the beta.
>
> The TS4 patch will be released after TS5.
>
> They (Omega) are late on their planning. Do you wish less power and more bugs,
> or the contrary ?
>
> The delay in this industry is very common, so you should be mithridatized if
> you were using computer software since a long time.
>
> My calendar shows 06/27/1998, so I do not worry about year 2000 for the
> moment.
> I do not care collecting contracts for the next century at this time.
>
> I do not understand how you can have such dummy ideas, selling your software
> included in the dummy list.
>
> With the small exception of what's above, I perfectly and fully agree with
> your post.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pierre Orphelin
> www.sirtrade.com
|