[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: T-Port vs. TurboExpress Port 920 -- Which is better?



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



John F. Berentson wrote:

> For all those considering adding com ports, make sure that you have
> unassigned  interrupts. I have three com ports, a sound card and a SCSI
> controller and all my interrupts have been assigned.
>
> FWIW, the TurboExpress can use 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 or 15.
>
> JFB
> Shaven Heads Trading
> NYC

 Just for your info, unless you are using all three comm ports, you can
unassign on or two and re-use the address or addresses on a card inside of
Win95 within the Settings and Control Panel section. My newest box is a
Dell Pentium Pro II 300 Mghz and I replaced its original comm ports with
the two on a twin TurboExpress card.

For someone that was asking about losing data because of overload...When I
first tried a TurboPort, I was running three computers with live feeds. I
had a T-Port on each of them. I installed a TurboPort on one of the
machines and ran it for a month and then compared the tick data randomly
for contracts on many days and there was no data loss present, although
there were a few times when my old T-Port machines lost data when I was
slowing down their processing and their buffer filled.

On the TorboExpress on my new machine, you can see on the software that is
resident when there is a data overflow. As I said once before, I have my
software set up so it gives me an error message that pops on my screen when
it overflows. It just doesn't happen.

Tim