[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fwd: Re: Omega List Status]



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

--- Begin Message ---
To: Jim Osborn <jimo@xxxxxxxxxx>, anatop <anatop@xxxxxxxxxxx>,       Bill Cruz <OfficeOfThePresident@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       Charles Kaucher <rsteinbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>,       Cliff Scheller <cliffsch@xxxxxxxxxx>,       Dennis Holverstott <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,       documentation <documentation@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       hans esser <he96@xxxxxxxxx>, "JAC1390@xxxxxxx" <JAC1390@xxxxxxx>,       James Murphy <jamesmur@xxxxxxxx>, James Rehler <jrehler@xxxxxxxxx>,       "janette.perez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <janette.perez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       Jobe Moss <jobe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LFPolk@xxxxxxx" <LFPolk@xxxxxxx>,       Michael Paauwe <mpaauwe@xxxxxxxxxx>,       Mike Connor <MarketWatch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       Mitch Ackles <mitch.ackles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       Peter 2150 <Peter2150@xxxxxxx>, Pierre Orphelin <Orphelin@xxxxxxx>,       "product.quality" <product.quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,       Randy Tareilo <taracent@xxxxxxxxx>,       Sanjay Sardana <sardana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Hearne <ted@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Omega List Status
From: OmegaBasher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:45:19 -0600
Organization: Mark Brown's The Traders Network at http://www.markbrown.com
References: <199802190119.RAA29547@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: OmegaBasher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

You are WRONG ! YOU ARE PUNISHING ME FOR SOMETHING OUTSIDE THE LIST
YOU FUCKING COMMIE!! You are in the back pocket of Omega, fuck you all, we got a war.
remember AOL , that wasn't shit. YOU and Mitch. well maybe you have an IDEA of the destruction
I am capable of BUT DON'T HIDE UNDER THE PRETENSE THAT YOU WERE PROTECTING
THE LIST CAUSE THE POST YOU EXPELLED ME FOR WASN'T POSTED TO YOUR LIST.
It was sent privately to a list of Solution Providers...

Does Bill and Mitches ass taste good? I really want to know? Mark Brown


I should have know that BS EXPRESS HAD SOMETHING TO WITH IT ALSO.

PS Will some of my friends that I'M CC ing make sure that the story is represented
correctly to the Omega-List, that I was expelled for a post that was outside the list.



Jim Osborn wrote:

> Mark,
>
> I hadn't read much of your posts, until this morning,
> when I came across this, forwarded by Bill Brower:
>
> >That does it you lying sob you take your tradestation and shove it
> >up Bills and your ass!  You told me you were going to send me a beta
> >before the conference because I could not attend. What a
> >disappointment, Why don't you just release the DAM 5.0 right now
> >because you don't give a shit about beta testing. What a fucking
> >asshole company you are.  No wonder your stock has gone to shit,
> >like your company has. I HOPE THE NEW WINDOW ON WALL STREET PRODUCT
> >"DAY TRADER PRO" THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY CONVERT EASY LANGUAGE
> >STUDIES INTO THEIR LANGUAGE "KICKS YOUR LYING ASS ALL OVER THE
> >PLACE" YOU DAM LYING DOG. ALSO I HAVE A LETTER FROM OMEGA THAT SAYS
> >YOU ARE TO GIVE SOLUTION PROVIDERS FREE UPDATES. WHY DON'T YOU GO
> >AHEAD AND TELL US NOW THAT WILL NOT BE THE CASE! CAUSE YOUR ABOUT TO
> >GO BROKE... KISS MY ASS OMEGA "BILL AND MITCH"
>
> The quotation above is way beyond the line (even for you :)), and
> when I read it I removed your name immediately, as an emergency
> measure.  That kind of diatribe has no place on my list.
>
> On further search this afternoon, though, I can't seem to find
> that quotation anywhere in the list traffic.  So, I'm left with
> the question: did you send it directly to Bill Brower?  Although
> I can't presume to control what correspondence list members pass
> between themselves, I am concerned with the overall noise level
> on the list.  If list subscribers come to expect that they will
> be attacked if they post to the list, they won't be eager to
> give the feedback which is the list's purpose.  Lots of members
> have already expressed this concern, and it's my job to do
> whatever I can to minimise it.
>
> Get this straight:  I control the subscriber list to omega-list.
> Neither Mitch, nor anyone else at Omega, had anything to do with
> my removing you this morning.  Given the recent noise level, and
> questions I have as to what was posted where, I think you need
> a "time out" from the list.  Much of what you've posted has merit,
> and I'm extremely reluctant to remove anyone, especially when
> they often have something worthwhile to contribute.  But right
> now, you're disrupting the list.  Clean up your act.
> --
> jimo@xxxxxxxxxx
> maintainer of the omega list
> omega-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx











--- End Message ---