[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: investigating possibility of experienced trading system partner


  • To: "A.J. Carisse" <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: investigating possibility of experienced trading system partner
  • From: "Jack Bicer" <bicer@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 23:16:06 -0800 (PST)

PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Are you saying that there are other rules that effect your entry and exit,
but you are unable to define them or put them in your trading system?

I know that developing a system with all the details/complications is pretty
difficult. But is not impossible or unattainable.


Jack Bicer
http://www.Bicer.com/jb
+-----------------------------------------------------------
+    http://www.Bicer.com
+    Micro Solutions Software
+    Specializing in custom Windows, C++
+    and Trading Software Development
+    Los Angeles, California
+-----------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: A.J. Carisse <carisse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Omega List <omega-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, January 24, 1998 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: investigating possibility of experienced trading system partner


>First, it would be very difficult to program all possible factors into a
trading
>system.  On the entry side, I use mine mostly as filters, alerting me to
>*potential* plays.  For example, I get a buy alert on a certain stock.  The
time
>of day and the overall market conditions have to be accounted for.  It's
9:48,
>we'll say, so I don't buy it, since I'd rather wait until the typical
pullback
>occurs here from an open, and decide again then.  Maybe the spread's too
wide on
>it.  Maybe there is a lot of supply on the offer.  I may not buy it simply
>because the play doesn't "feel right."  And so on.  While I'm a strong
believer
>in the "science" of trading, I also believe that it is still to a degree an
art.
>
>Regards,
>A.J.
>