|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Greetings Bruce and Ron:
I also agree with your suggestions.
My post a couple of days ago about an acquaintance having spoke with an
omega sales rep,and the answers he gave,were,in general,a response (from
a small part of the "horses mouth",ie:omega) to what seems to be some of
the more vexing concerns expressed on this list.
Regards,
Ruth
Ron Augustine wrote:
>
>
> In my opinion, your idea is good-- but it is probably something that should
> have been done at least one year ago (or earlier) to have any impact.
> Whatever new or improved features are to be included in TS-5 have been
> planned for quite a while and the programming has presumably also been in
> progress for quite some time. Regardless, it would be interesting to see
> what priorities and features the people on the list would consider
> important-- assuming you wanted to take the time to organize and manage such
> a project.
>
> With regard to the Y2K compatibility issue, imo - it would be a throw-away
> vote, since Omega must comply with this to stay in business and they have
> already acknowledged that they would do so.
>
> -------------------------------------
> At 04:43 pm 1/17/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >Having read all the criticism and support of both Omega and Tradestation, I
> >think it's time we tried to do something constructive with all the good
> >points that have been made. Many of us have sent Omega individual messages
> >concerning problems with TS and features we'd like to see in TS 5. Rather
> >than just have these ideas float in one at a time, I propose that we
> >assemble a general list of the features we want to see in TS 5 and have
> >every member of this email list vote on them as to their priority. For
> >instance, I personally feel that year 2000 compatibility is the biggest
> >issue, so I would vote that #1. Others who don't agree can vote it much
> >lower.
>
|