|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
In my opinion, your idea is good-- but it is probably something that should
have been done at least one year ago (or earlier) to have any impact.
Whatever new or improved features are to be included in TS-5 have been
planned for quite a while and the programming has presumably also been in
progress for quite some time. Regardless, it would be interesting to see
what priorities and features the people on the list would consider
important-- assuming you wanted to take the time to organize and manage such
a project.
With regard to the Y2K compatibility issue, imo - it would be a throw-away
vote, since Omega must comply with this to stay in business and they have
already acknowledged that they would do so.
-------------------------------------
At 04:43 pm 1/17/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Having read all the criticism and support of both Omega and Tradestation, I
>think it's time we tried to do something constructive with all the good
>points that have been made. Many of us have sent Omega individual messages
>concerning problems with TS and features we'd like to see in TS 5. Rather
>than just have these ideas float in one at a time, I propose that we
>assemble a general list of the features we want to see in TS 5 and have
>every member of this email list vote on them as to their priority. For
>instance, I personally feel that year 2000 compatibility is the biggest
>issue, so I would vote that #1. Others who don't agree can vote it much
>lower.
|