[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Synthetic cycle generator



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Again great work Jose. Nice study. Thanks.
KS


--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jose Silva" 
<josesilva22@xxxx> wrote:
> Maurice, the Synthetic cycle generator's plot is not meant to be 
> smooth, but rather an artificial representation of price and its 
> possible (very) basic components.
> 
> For best/easiest results, plot the indicator in a separate window 
> using the default settings.
> 
> 
> jose '-)
> http://www.metastocktools.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Maurice Odekerken" 
<maurice.
> odekerken@xxxx> wrote:
> > Could you shoot a picture in paint (Alt-Print Screen) en some
> > parameters to go with that, please?
> > My line, is not smooth at all..................
> >
> > 
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Namens Jose Silva
> > Verzonden: vrijdag 9 september 2005 16:18
> > Aan: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Onderwerp: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] Synthetic cycle generator
> > 
> > > *	a straight-line sloping component in there to simplify
> > > the long-term fundamental influence.
> > 
> > The long-term fundamental influence - I guess that would be sine 
> wave 
> > 1.
> > 
> > 
> > > I'm stuck with that - can't do it without screwing up the nice
> > > smooth sinewave shape.
> > 
> > I can't think of a solution either, that would not destroy the 
> > integrity of the sine waves.  Randomizing/increasing the 
frequency/
> > amplitude of the sine waves would unfortunately also destroy the 
> whole 
> > point of this exercise.
> > 
> > 
> > As for the point of this exercise, one could view and compare 
the 
> > different sine wave components of the synthetic plot, to the 
> different 
> > groups of investors, traders, day-traders that affect a normal 
price 
> > pattern.
> > 
> > The large investors with the deep pockets would be the 
commercials 
> > and/or large funds, accumulating/selling stock or contracts over 
a 
> > longer period of time.  This would equate to the large sine wave 
> > component in the synthetic pattern generator.
> > 
> > The smaller/quicker traders would account for the 
smaller/quicker 
> > influences, and so on, right down to the small random market 
noise - 
> > which just happens to be generated by my own trading.  :)
> > 
> > 
> > No doubt the markets are a lot more complex than this artificial 
> > facsimile, but it can be one of those tools that can help in 
one's 
> > understanding of the machinations in the markets.
> > 
> > 
> > jose '-)
> > http://www.metastocktools.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Andy" 
<AndyDavidson@xxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > Getting there Jose. I didn't mean for you to actually take up 
the
> > > gauntlet when I suggested the extra factors, but I should have 
> known 
> > > better! Glad you did though as it's starting to look 
quite "real"
> > > eh? Head-and-shoulders, ascending/descending wedges, pennants,
> > > 3-wavers/5-wavers.they're all there!
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Just needs two more things (if you're up for the challenge 
still 
> !!
> > ):
> > > 
> > > *	a straight-line sloping component in there to simplify the 
long-
> > > term fundamental influence.e.g. cum(1)/lastvalue(cum(1))
*strength
> > > factor ??
> > > *	Hurst said the cyclic component duration *and magnitude*
> > > fluctuate slowly with time (both are related in that deviation 
to
> > > longer duration/period corresponds to a deviation towards 
larger
> > > magnitude). I'm stuck with that - can't do it without screwing 
up
> > > the nice smooth sinewave shape. I'm not asking you to do it 
either
> > > because it's probably a bridge too far just to make an academic
> > > point.but if you have any ideas spring straight to mind it'd be
> > > nice.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > Andy 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   _____  
> > > 
> > > From: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> > equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > On Behalf Of Jose Silva
> > > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:49 AM
> > > To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] Synthetic cycle generator
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Ok, try this pattern generator version:
> > > 
> > > =========================
> > > Synthetic cycle generator
> > > =========================
> > > ---8<--------------------------
> > > 
> > > { 5-wave synthetic cycle generator v2.0 }
> > > { Refresh chart for new simulations }
> > > 
> > > { Download  Random.dll  from
> > >   http://www.traderhelp.net  and place in
> > >   MetaStock External Function DLLs folder }
> > > 
> > > { Basic idea from Andy Davidson at:
> > > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock , and:
> > > http://www.stockmarketcycles.com/technica.htm }
> > > 
> > > { CCopyright 2005 Jose Silva
> > >   For personal use only.
> > >   http://www.metastocktools.com }
> > > 
> > > { User inputs }
> > > plot:=Input("Sine-wave cycles:  [1]Composite,  [2]
Individual",1,2,
> 1
> > );
> > > Sval1:=Input("Sine 1 value",-720,720,1);
> > > Sval2:=Input("Sine 2 value",-720,720,3.5);
> > > Sval3:=Input("Sine 3 value",-720,720,12);
> > > Sval4:=Input("Sine 4 value",-720,720,42);
> > > Sval5:=Input("Sine 5 value",-720,720,150);
> > > 
> > > { Random generator engine }
> > > x:=ExtFml("Random.Number",-1)/66.66667+.5;
> > > 
> > > { Sine components }
> > > sine1:=Sin(Cum(Sval1*x));
> > > x:=ExtFml("Random.Number",-1)/66.66667+.5;
> > > sine2:=Sin(Cum(Sval2*x))*.5;
> > > x:=ExtFml("Random.Number",-1)/66.66667+.5;
> > > sine3:=Sin(Cum(Sval3*x))*.25;
> > > x:=ExtFml("Random.Number",-1)/66.66667+.5;
> > > sine4:=Sin(Cum(Sval4*x))*.125;
> > > x:=ExtFml("Random.Number",-1)/66.66667+.5;
> > > sine5:=Sin(Cum(Sval5*x))*.0625;
> > > 
> > > { Composite Sine }
> > > composite:=sine1+sine2+sine3+sine4+sine5;
> > > 
> > > { Plot in own window }
> > > If(plot=1,composite,sine1);
> > > If(plot=1,composite,sine2);
> > > If(plot=1,composite,sine3);
> > > If(plot=1,composite,sine4);
> > > If(plot=1,composite,sine5)
> > > 
> > > ---8<--------------------------
> > > 
> > > 
> > > jose '-)
> > > http://www.metastocktools.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Andy" 
<AndyDavidson@xxxx> 
> > > wrote:
> > > Nice one Jose! I was thinking about trying to do something 
like 
> that
> > > myself, but I'm sure that what took you 10 minutes would have 
> taken
> > > me the best part of a day.Thanks for saving me the time!!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Now, if you imagine two additional factors:
> > > 
> > > 1)       An underlying trend represented by a straight upward/
> > > downward sloping line, or even a much longer-period cycle, that
> > > represents the "fundamental" influence on a market.
> > > 
> > > 2)      That the periodicity of all the cycles is not constant 
but
> > > has some minor variation about their nominal value.
> > > 
> > > And you can see how, when lots of "simple" stuff is added 
together
> > > it can easily look very complicated and random! This is the 
> general
> > > gist of what Hurst was on about.
> > >  
> > > 
> > > MG, what's interesting to me is that if you plot Jose's 
indicator
> > > and look at the individual cycles, then zoom out the chart view
> > > sufficiently, all the small cycles start to look rather like 
white
> > > noise. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Maybe I misunderstand the academics(!) but if its the smoothing
> > > process that creates cycles where none existed before then why 
can
> > > we look at an un-smoothed price chart and *see* tradeable 
cycles?
> > > Why do chart patterns occur so frequently? Are these purely 
random
> > > in nature, even on the week/month time scale? Surely it 
depends on
> > > what time-scale/magnification level you're looking at.i.e. 
what 
> you
> > > actually define as a "trade cycle"? In other words, sure there 
> must
> > > be an element of noise at the very high frequency end of the
> > > spectrum (which even itself looks like cyclical behaviour). 
But as
> > > you go up orders of magnitude that effect must decrease 
> dramatically 
> > > and more predicatable influences take over. These would mainly
> > > result, I would think, from the crowd-mentality of 
speculators.but 
> I 
> > > don't want to get into an Elliot argument here (although I'm 
sure 
> I
> > > can see 3 and 5-wave patterns in Jose's indicator)!!
> > > Then, eventually, the "fundamentals" start to have a distinct
> > > influence. At some point on this scale, as noise gives way to 
> crowd
> > > behaviour and then to fundamentals, you get a point where 
efforts 
> at 
> > > modelling/predicting what's going on start to bear fruit?




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Help tsunami villages rebuild at GlobalGiving. The real work starts now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/njNroD/KbOLAA/cosFAA/BefplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/