|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
"I don't understand why some of the brainier people on this board
don't have an alternate product for sale just to test systems."
Martin, I don't understand it either.
I mean, why would Roy give away his Trade Equity set of powerful, bug-
free, real-time backtesting tools, for free? It just doesn't seem
very smart, and it probably means that his best work goes
unappreciated...
http://www.metastocktips.co.nz/te_formulas.html
Of course, if you want to try the best commercial backtesting product
for MetaStock, there is always TradeSim:
http://www.compuvision.com.au/index.htm
jose '-)
http://www.metastocktools.com
--- In equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Martin Blain" <martin@xxxx>
wrote:
> Marco
> I know for fact they are aware of the problem. If they fix is it is
> another thing. It all depends on the agenda. I can't help but think
> there is an underlying method to make the systems look for a
> presentation when selling the product. What else would explain such
> a malfunction.
> I don't understand why some of the brainier people on this board
> don't have an alternate product for sale just to test systems. I do
> recognize that most system have false trades but surely there is a
> way to do this. What bothered me is that I had a decent system that
> should have tested well and it wasn't until I started dissecting it
> that I discovered the underlying problem.
> Martin Blain
> Burlington Ontario
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: khamsina11
> To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 4:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] System Tester 8.01 vs 9.0
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Let's hope Equis is aware of these serious bogs !
>
> Regards,
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> Martin Blain a écrit :
> Marco
> When I test one or two single stocks on a system the results are
> inaccurate. Points test may be accurate but I fail to understand how
> a point only test can give you an honest opinion of a system where
> two points on a low dollar stock is much more than on a higher value
> stock. I had to manually calculate the percentage gain or loss on
> each result. I know it wasn't this way before. I had been
> experimenting with stop losses and had no problem on version 8.
>
> Martin Blain
> Burlington Ontario
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: khamsina11
> To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [EquisMetaStock Group] System Tester 8.01 vs 9.0
>
> Martin Blain a écrit :
> Haders
> I think it is actually worse.
>
> Martin Blain
> Burlington Ontario
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Are you sure ?
> Could you be more precise ?
>
> Tia
>
> Marco
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: haders2003
> To: equismetastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:21 PM
> Subject: [EquisMetaStock Group] System Tester 8.01 vs 9.0
>
> Hi
>
> Has anyone been able to ascertain whether the system tester in MS9.0
> has been improved over the one in MS8.01?
>
> I find it hard to believe that Equis would release MS9.0 without
> solving the problems in the MS8.01 version but then again how did
> the numerous problems in the system tester in 8.01 ever get past any
> kind of quality control?
>
> Before I waste too much time with MS9.0 I would appreciate any input
> with regard to system tester performance.
>
> Thanks
>
> Haders
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Tcy2bD/SOnJAA/cosFAA/BefplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/equismetastock/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
equismetastock-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|