I think TA alone would work better then a lot of
emotions. Perhaps the writer just hasn't found his own personal holy
grail.
Maybe its time for a little friendly competition.
This could be easily done by having a common user and password to a yahoo
account. We could then have individual portfolios with 10 stocks
chosen over the period of 1 -2 weeks and held for 60days
Martin Blain Burlington Ontario
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:08
PM
Subject: Re: [Metastockusers] Re:
Introducing myself
I can't say never but I think we generally
agree.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 3:47
PM
Subject: [Metastockusers] Re:
Introducing myself
I agree, I wouldn't trade without TA either, but T/A
alone will never work!
Larry
--- In Metastockusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"rdb104" <richandellen@x...>
wrote: > MessageI never thought a purely mechanical system could
work..but wouldn't trade without TA. > ----- Original
Message ----- > From: Book > To:
'onlinetradersclub ' ; 'equismetastock ' ; 'internetstocknews ' ;
'Metastockusers ' ; 'momostocks ' ; 'mutualfunds ' ; 'myqqqsystem '
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 3:00
PM > Subject: [Metastockusers] Introducing myself >
> > I would like to introduce myself to this
group. > > > > I am
a retired manager of a major U.S. corporation. I was educated in the
fields of mathematics, electrical engineering and computer science and I
have had an interest in stock market analysis for nearly 20 years.
> > > > I believe
my background skills have given me a unique insight into technical
analysis, allowing me to look at and understand the mathematics behind
technical analysis formulas, take an unbiased common sense approach to
the results of these formulas and develop a system that does not succumb
to the short falls of Technical Analysis. >
> > > I have been
studying technical analysis in the stock market since 1987, testing and
analyzing hundreds of formulas and charts. I began by using
commercial software with built in formulas, then wrote my own formulas
and finally wrote my own software and formulas. >
> > > I am now writing a
book "An Analysis of Technical Analysis", which is far from complete but
there is some very relevant information that I will point you to a
little later. > > >
> I have also been lurking and contributing on many
forums over the last 10 years or so, and I have made several
observations. > > >
> 1.. The questions are generally the same,
form year to year. Some technical question on how to get a formula
or program to work and some general questions on how to make a system
that really works. The technical questions are usually answered in
detail but the system questions are rarely answered except in the most
general terms. > 2.. There are usually
one or two Gurus who expound "I have developed a system that really
works well" but they never give explicit details on how this system
works and they never give actual trades until well after the trades have
happened. This gives way too much opportunity to "adjust" the
figures. In other words, they never prove themselves.
> 3.. After a period of time, a year or less,
these Gurus disappear from the scene. Did they lose all their
money, or can't they just keep up the BS? >
> > Why is this the case? I will answer this
a little later. > > >
> First I want to say that I have created a "commercial"
market timing website, but I will not advertise or even mention the name
here so that the moderator of this group won't ban me. My main
concern is to get some very pertinent market timing information to
those of you who are really interested in trying to time the
market. > > > > Let
me start out this way. Technical analysis (using mathematical
formulas only) DOES NOT WORK, WILL NOT WORK, AND YOU WILL JUST LOSE YOUR
MONEY! > > > > How
can I possibly say such a thing, especially when I said I own a market
timing web site? > > >
> I said "Technical analysis (using mathematical formulas
only)". Mathematical formulas, no mater how simple or complex, try
to match a recurrence, or pattern, in the market. They simply do
not predict anything! > > >
> Experts contend that the market is "random" and
"efficient". We all know that random events cannot be predicted
and if something is really efficient there are no disparities to
capitalize on. These two factors alone tell you that the market is
impossible, or nearly impossible to predict, using mathematical
formulas. > > >
> If you would like to learn a little more about
technical analysis, what works and what doesn't, and what you REALLY
need to look for you can read more of my upcoming book. The start
is here "An Analysis of Technical Analysis" or you can get the quick and
dirty "summary" here. > > >
> It won't cost you a cent, but it might save you
several! > > > >
Thanks for reading. > > >
> Larry > >
> Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor
>
ADVERTISEMENT >
>
> > >
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- >
Yahoo! Groups Links > > a.. To visit
your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Metastockusers/ >
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an
email to: >
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
| |
|
Yahoo! Groups Links
|