[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Metastockusers] Re: An ICE experiment--Jay's results



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links



<<Since you have been dis-satisfied from the moment you discovered it didn't come with open code, I would not bother with it. The probablity is really low that will grow on you over time.>>
 
It's not just the lack of ability to view the formula, but they don't give you a clue as to what they are optimizing.  You can look at the stochastic results and see that they have 3 optimizations.  But what the hell are they?  Equis 'standard' stochastic optimization results optimizes 2 items.  ICE optimizes 3 - of what?  My stochastic optimized 4.
 
To say that their results are "normalized" is a gross misnomer.  You can normalize results by going over several years of data or as in the case of futures, several years of the same month's data.
 
ICE is WORSE than a black box.  It doesn't give you a clue as to what's happening.  It's a bust.
 
Jay






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.