[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Metastockusers] Live trading of the free expert , Clayburg, TM, and Pring



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links






<FONT face=Arial 
size=2>JO wrote: <FONT 
size=3>"... I 
thought that MS<FONT 
face=Arial>  said they based their trough and peak 
functions on the zig zag but Joe said the MS files say the peak and trough 
function is exactly the same as the zig zag, and therefore, they have exactly 
the same problems. Knowing that, I'm not going to write anymore experts with 
them because I don't like the zig zag function the way I've seen it used. It 
misleads some people<SPAN 
class=834481900-15072003>...." <SPAN 
class=834481900-15072003><FONT 
size=3>.  
 <SPAN 
class=834481900-15072003>
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Just to clarify, I didn't say that the MS files said that Peak 
and Trough were exactly the same as Zig Zag.  I said that 
they were based on Zig Zag so the same principals apply - 
meaning the Peak and Trough indicators can change in the future when 
new bars and printed.
<FONT 
color=#0000ff> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Specifically, here is what the MS help file 
says:
<FONT 
color=#0000ff> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Under Peak, for example it says:
<FONT 
color=#0000ff> 
 <FONT 
face=Arial>"This uses the Zig Zag function (see Zig Zag) to 
determine the peaks."
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Then under Zig Zag is says:
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>"Be forewarned, that the last leg (i.e., segment) of the Zig Zag is 
dynamic, meaning that it can change.  Therefore, be careful when designing 
system tests, experts, etc. based on the Zig Zag 
indicator."
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Thus, to the extent that you relied on the "Free Expert" and went back in 
time to look at what the signals "would have been", they could be different than 
what actually printed on the chart on those bars at the time.  It is likely 
that some of the signals changed as new bars were being printed off on the 
chart.  It will be interesting to see, as you follow the chart "live" 
how the signals compare when you go back and look at it again a week from 
now.  Remember, you have to take the reading before a new bar prints 
because the next bar could change the signal.  In your case, you can't just 
wait until the end of the day and go back and look at the chart to see how the 
30 min bars looked.  For this reason alone, you'll probably end up scraping 
that Expert until it is fixed.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Have you thought about trying the Zig Zag validity (I think 
that is what he called it) indicator that Spyros wrote?  It 
actually removes the dynamic aspects from the Zig Zag 
indicator and makes it valid for Experts, backtesting, 
etc.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Good Trading,  
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial 
size=2>Joe J.<SPAN 
class=834481900-15072003>  







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Metastockusers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.