Re: e Signal and MS 7.03

["Theo E.M. Lockefeer" <sky40912@xxxxxxxxx>]

hi Joe :
 
Please look at my TL-remarks.
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  <A title=joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:joeduffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Joe Duffy 
  To: <A title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 6:00 
  AM
  Subject: e Signal and MS 7.03
  
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    If one is considering going to an eSignal feed would a 
    true dedicated line that is not used for any other internet functions like 
    e-mail, or browser be best?
     
     
    TL : probably YES  MS + Esignal asks a lot 
    of your computer but of course if you have POWER
           all is 
    relative.
     
          (after a lot of tuning it 
    works on 400MHZ + 64 MB intern but you have to close as many
            as possible 
    applications in this situation).
     
     
     Or does it matter at all?
     
     
     
     
     
    Any comments on the reliability of eSignal 
    itself,
     
    TL :  my observation : ok  (Support 
    Esginal could be a lot better).
     
     
     as well as eSignal with MS 7.03 would also be 
    appreciated. 
     
    TL : Equis support when i needed is was 
    ok.
     
     
     
    Thanks for the consideration.
     
    TL : it is nothing  :)   (belgian saying 
    (but i am dutch))
     
    Greetings Theo Lockefeer.