[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MetaStock Outlook Express/2000



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I am talking about Outlook Express only.
Lionel Issen
lissen@xxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Martinez" <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: MetaStock Outlook Express/2000


> Are you talking about OE's internal view or the actual file structure in
Windows
> Explorer?  I've been thinking about switching to IE 5.0 and Outlook 2000
(which
> I have) but it would take time away from my QP & MS scans.  It would also
be a
> nightmare.  I'm getting tired of all this upgrading and learning new
programs
> anyway.
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> Lionel Issen wrote:
>
> > I have many files in OE. I have a number of folders that have a sub
folder
> > and a sub sub folder. It is very easy to create a new folder or sub
folder
> > on the fly. OE also has a spell checker.
> > Lionel Issen
> > lissen@xxxxxxxxx
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Martinez" <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 2:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock
> >
> > A.J.:
> > my Netscape v4.75 has 150 MB in emails.  I understand OE only uses one
(1)
> > file for ALL its
> > email.  I decided against using OE for now.  Also, I don't want to take
the
> > time to migrate
> > to OE.  I want to spend all my spare time reviewing TA and running
either QP
> > v2.x or
> > MetaStock scans.
> >
> > Many other users on this ListServ don't want to get HTML from their
> > ListServ's because it
> > bloats their email files and taxes their email 'Net connection.
> >
> > Daniel.
>