[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Sending messages twice, then isn't?

We're not getting to see the "attachments" + "HTML" winch-bag-mails again, are we?

Whatever you vote for is your decission. Perhaps you decide on a AT386.
Perhaps on a color TV. Perhaps on QP and not MSK. But, whatever you do:
your decission is your responsability, not anyone else's.

If your decission becomes or is YOUR PROBLEM, then you keep it or solve it.
It is YOURS all the way and NOT anyone else's.

Now back to TA+MSK....................!!!!

Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
Homepage  http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas


----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Daniel Martinez" <DanM@xxxxxxxxxx>
Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Verzonden: maandag 23 oktober 2000 20:14
Onderwerp: Re: Advanced Get versus MetaStock


A.J.:
my Netscape v4.75 has 150 MB in emails.  I understand OE only uses one (1) file for ALL its
email.  I decided against using OE for now.  Also, I don't want to take the time to migrate
to OE.  I want to spend all my spare time reviewing TA and running either QP v2.x or
MetaStock scans.

Many other users on this ListServ don't want to get HTML from their ListServ's because it
bloats their email files and taxes their email 'Net connection.

Daniel.


"A.J. Maas" wrote:

> Head+Shoulders(H,S)
> Height(H)
> Break(B)
> --------snip-----------