|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Looks like the info at the URL I suggested wasn't up to the task, Ton.
Any other way I can help?
Bob
*I do have 10/100 NICs and a dual-CPU main machine BTW.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of A.J. Maas
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 4:14 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Windows me vs Windows 2000
>
>
> Unless you have a Network >10x WS's or use a => Dual MoBo, then there is
> never a need to trade in "your car for a truck".
>
> WIN2k {and its predecessor 4NT} load a truckfull of applications
> that are never
> ever required by straight forward home or very small network PC users.
> Their OS's are slow on and whilst at their startup processes and
> also slowdown
> every time the Opening processes of other resource hungry
> applications (ACAD,
> Word, Excel, MSK etc.) this since both OS's are resource hungry
> themselves {and
> with all the users' security-and-live-event-logging processes
> active} taking up >2x
> the MEM capacity of that of a 9.x OS. Then they both have the
> nasty habbit too to
> continiously run all sorts of unrequired applications and threads
> simulantainiously
> just when you want to run yours. Plain useless and very overdone
> for normal
> everyday home use, eg therefore the above "truck vs car" comparrison.
>
> WinME is an option tho, but only to be considdered by current
> Win98 and Win95
> users. Users of Win98SE do not need the upgrade, they can just go to the
> Windows Update site and download and install IE5.5 and the new
> Media player.
>
> Next year the now beta tested and code named Whistler will finaly
> be on the market,
> which for upgrade to current 9x and ME users will be released as
> the Win2k-Personal
> Edition and that OS will be worth your while waiting for, eg as a
> Win95/8 or 98SE or
> as a ME user. Win2k-Professional Edition will be made available
> as a new WS-version.
>
> Based on the Win2k kernel, Win2kPE will come as a light
> -unloaded- edition, eg unloaded
> form all the unnecessary running mumbo jumbo applications and
> threads refered to above,
> but included will be the NTFS files system base known from "old"
> NT, eg that will save you
> the regular time spend on disk maintenance, since that NTFS is
> suppose to be a self
> maintaining disk file system.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> For the new advantages of ME over 98 or 98SE or even 95:
>
> (taken from the Exploring Windows Editor):
>
> If you're still thinking about whether Windows Me is right for
> you, we've got 10 great
> reasons why you should get it now. We know we may be biased, but
> check out our list.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsME/upgrade/upgradewhy.asp
>
> Whether you're buying a new computer or just want to improve the
> one you already have,
> it's easy to get Windows Me. Windows Me brings you better digital
> media, home networking,
> computer health, and more. Here's how to get started.
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsME/guide/howtobuy/default.asp
>
> (and should you wish to view an unbiased review, taken from Pual
> Thurrot's WinInfo daily email)
>
> Want more? Visit our SuperSite for Windows--a site dedicated to
> providing all of the information you need to evaluate, administer, and
> use Microsoft Windows OSs. You'll find FAQs, reviews, and technology
> showcases--all designed to give you the information you need to decide
> which Windows OS is for you. Paul Thurrott, the SuperSite's author, is
> a recognized Windows expert with more than 10 years of Windows
> experience.
> http://www.winsupersite.com/
>
>
> Regards,
> Ton Maas
> ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying.
> Homepage http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
>
>
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> Van: "Guy Tann" <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Aan: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Verzonden: dinsdag 10 oktober 2000 21:42
> Onderwerp: RE: Windows me vs Windows 2000
>
>
> > Lionel,
> >
> > Let me know what you discover. I have both W2K Professional
> and WinMe here
> > in boxes and have been waiting to install them.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Guy
> >
> > Politicians and diapers have one thing in common. They should both be
> > changed regularly and for the same reason.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Lionel Issen
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:52 AM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Windows me vs Windows 2000
>
> What are the relative advantages/disadvantages of Win ME vs Win 2000. I am
> presently using Win 98 2nd edition.
> Lionel Issen
> lissen@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
|