|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-flowed>
Brooke,
Thanks for the gif.! That was a tiny pic but I was able to distinguish what
you were doing. Appeared that you had 3 moving averages on the chart as
well. I wasn't sure about what part was proprietary. Was it your signal or
the MAs? Either way you've found something that works and that's GREAT!
Congratulations on a successful trade.
J.
>From: "Brooke" <brookelise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Bollinger Bands & Formula Monkeys
>Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:00:02 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [204.246.137.2] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
>MHotMailBB5B085600C2D820F3D8CCF6890252350; Wed Aug 09 13:21:46 2000
>Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id
>NAA27910for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:55:09 -0600
>Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com
>[204.246.137.5])by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
>NAA27903for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:55:05 -0600
>Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net
>[207.69.200.226])by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id
>OAA22098for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 14:19:56 -0600 (MDT)
>Received: from brookema (pool-209-138-23-137.cmbr.grid.net
>[209.138.23.137])by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id
>QAA21676for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
>From majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Aug 09 13:24:09 2000
>X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to
>owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
>Message-ID: <038701c0023c$68d42200$7b148ad1@xxxxxxxx>
>References: <F49xpItaguJ1eFMYUhy00002544@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
>Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>
>iseed:
>
>With the daily interval for AMAT, for example, the Boll. band system was
>consistently profitable for a period of 2 years. In fact, there wasn't one
>losing long trade, and that's with no stops. There were two losing short
>trades, and yet even the short trades as a whole netted a profit. I can
>think of worse systems.
>
>Here's the latest entry signal, at the lower B band (yellow). There's a
>percentage formula for getting in, but it's proprietary, as it were. See
>that beautiful bounce? That comes from buying at the lower band. Yes
>indeedy. Don't work was made to work, I guess.
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: j seed <jseed_10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 3:38 PM
>Subject: Re: Bollinger Bands & Formula Monkeys
>
>
> > Lenny,
> > Maybe a picture would prove your point. Could you send a gif of the
>trades?
> > J
> >
> > >From: ROSOW@xxxxxxx
> > >Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: Re: Bollinger Bands & Formula Monkeys
> > >Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:00:26 EDT
> > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > >Received: from [204.246.137.2] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> > >MHotMailBB5AC29B000CD820F397CCF6890266660; Wed Aug 09 08:24:23 2000
> > >Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7)
>id
> > >IAA17538for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:54:27 -0600
> > >Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com
> > >[204.246.137.5])by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
> > >IAA17535for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:54:24
>-0600
> > >Received: from imo-r15.mx.aol.com (imo-r15.mx.aol.com
>[152.163.225.69])by
> > >freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA21700for
> > ><metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:19:13 -0600 (MDT)
> > >Received: from ROSOW@xxxxxxxxx imo-r15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id
> > >u.7b.800c57c (4402) for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000
>11:00:26
> > >-0400 (EDT)
> > >From majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Aug 09 08:27:58 2000
> > >X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to
> > >owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
> > >Message-ID: <7b.800c57c.26c2cc0a@xxxxxxx>
> > >X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120
> > >Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Precedence: bulk
> > >
> > >Doug,
> > > First of all I witnessed Brooke make those trades using Bollinger
> > >Bands
> > >in real time. It pays, in more ways then one, to be open minded before
> > >making
> > >carte blanche statements such as the ones you have made. And second,
>you
> > >need to take a look at yourself in the mirror because it seems you've
> > >become
> > >a "Formula Monkey" yourself! And I quote "Draw some support/resistance
> > >levels, a few trendlines, and an oscillator (i.e. stochastic) for
> > >overbought/oversold." What the heck do you think stochastics are
>derived
> > >from? Thin air? By the way, love to see how great Oscillators work in
>a
> > >TRENDING market, you know sell when it crosses 80 while the stock is
> > >trending
> > >up, yikes!! - Lenny
> > >
> > >In a message dated 08/09/2000 6:38:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > >brookelise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > >
> > ><< I made a few bucks trading some tech stocks off the lower B band
>last
> > >week
> > > and this week, Doug (for example AMD, AMAT and CSCO). And what's
>more,
> > >the
> > > trades were based on a system that makes consistent profits. The
>signals
> > > were plain as day.
> > >
> > > -- A Formula Monkey
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
</x-flowed>
|