[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bollinger Bands & Formula Monkeys



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-flowed>
Lenny,
Maybe a picture would prove your point. Could you send a gif of the trades?
J

>From: ROSOW@xxxxxxx
>Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Bollinger Bands & Formula Monkeys
>Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:00:26 EDT
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from [204.246.137.2] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id 
>MHotMailBB5AC29B000CD820F397CCF6890266660; Wed Aug 09 08:24:23 2000
>Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id 
>IAA17538for metastock-outgoing; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:54:27 -0600
>Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com 
>[204.246.137.5])by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id 
>IAA17535for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 08:54:24 -0600
>Received: from imo-r15.mx.aol.com (imo-r15.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.69])by 
>freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA21700for 
><metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:19:13 -0600 (MDT)
>Received: from ROSOW@xxxxxxxxx imo-r15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id 
>u.7b.800c57c (4402) for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 11:00:26 
>-0400 (EDT)
>From majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Aug 09 08:27:58 2000
>X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to 
>owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
>Message-ID: <7b.800c57c.26c2cc0a@xxxxxxx>
>X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 120
>Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>
>Doug,
>     First of all I witnessed Brooke make those trades using Bollinger 
>Bands
>in real time. It pays, in more ways then one, to be open minded before 
>making
>carte blanche statements such as the ones you have made.  And second, you
>need to take a look at yourself in the mirror because it seems you've 
>become
>a "Formula Monkey" yourself!  And I quote "Draw some support/resistance
>levels, a few trendlines, and an oscillator (i.e. stochastic) for
>overbought/oversold."  What the heck do you think stochastics are derived
>from?  Thin air? By the way, love to see how great Oscillators work in a
>TRENDING market, you know sell when it crosses 80 while the stock is 
>trending
>up, yikes!! - Lenny
>
>In a message dated 08/09/2000 6:38:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>brookelise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
><< I made a few bucks trading some tech stocks off the lower B band last 
>week
>  and this week, Doug (for example AMD, AMAT and CSCO). And what's more, 
>the
>  trades were based on a system that makes consistent profits. The signals
>  were plain as day.
>
>  -- A Formula Monkey
>
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
</x-flowed>