|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I know this question was asked some time ago but I
can't find the answer in my archives. When plotting simple moving
averages[50,200,etc] I'm getting results that differ when compared to identical
simple moving averages plotted by other programs. The other comparisons are
identical with each other but differ by a wide margin when compared to
MetaStock's . Is this a problem with my software or am I incorrectly
plotting this average somehow? Could it be an incorrect default setting for an
ending date or what? Thank you.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sat Feb 19 10:03:11 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20059
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 09:56:34 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA24552
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:11:16 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA24549
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:11:14 -0700
Received: from fb00.eng00.mindspring.net (fb00.eng00.mindspring.net [207.69.200.31])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA28546
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:25:14 -0700 (MST)
Received: from nwf-nj28-31.ix.netcom.com (nwf-nj28-31.ix.netcom.com [198.211.22.223])
by fb00.eng00.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA31419
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:09:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Christian Baude <BAUDECB@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: moving average discrepancies
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:09:22 -0500
Message-ID: <jgjtasgeohq1leebuikhaurahospv2m8kh@xxxxxxx>
References: <002a01bf7af7$f68056e0$0101010a@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <002a01bf7af7$f68056e0$0101010a@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.equis.com id KAA24550
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000 11:39:59 -0500, you wrote:
> I know this question was asked some time ago but I can't
> find the answer in my archives. When plotting simple moving'
> averages[50,200,etc] I'm getting results that differ when
> compared to identical simple moving averages plotted by
> other programs.
Picture?
-÷ Chris ß ÷-
|