|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#d8d0c8>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lionel,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>S&P 500 is at <A
href="http://www.spglobal.com/ssindexmain500text.html";>http://www.spglobal.com/ssindexmain500text.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>S&P 400 is at <A
href="http://www.spglobal.com/ssindexmain400text.html";>http://www.spglobal.com/ssindexmain400text.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>S&P 600 is at <A
href="http://www.spglobal.com/ssindexmain600text.html";>http://www.spglobal.com/ssindexmain600text.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Joe</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><B>-----Original Message-----</B><BR><B>From:
</B>lissen@xxxxxxx <<A
href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxx";>lissen@xxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>To: </B><A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> <<A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B>Date:
</B>Saturday, January 15, 2000 12:30 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>S&P
lists<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>I was able to download the S&P 500 list at the
S&P web site. I was not<BR>able to access the list for the S&P
mid cap and small cap stocks.<BR><BR>Where can I access these
lists?<BR><BR><BR>Lionel Issen<BR><A
href="mailto:lissen@xxxxxxxxx";>lissen@xxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jan 17 09:32:18 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA00294
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:37:10 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA01607
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 15:51:01 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA01604
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 15:50:57 -0700
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA02427
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:01:48 -0700 (MST)
Received: from escom ([195.121.218.55]) by smtp02.wxs.nl
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with SMTP id AAA15DB
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:46:02 +0100
Message-ID: <003201bf5faa$b3547940$37da79c3@xxxxx>
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <004701bf5f7b$7857cf60$38e8adce@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: to be or not to be
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:47:39 +0100
Organization: Ms-IRB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01BF5FB2.E813EAA0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.2800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#d8d0c8>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I am speaking from a user and shareholder's point of view, and
not forgetting what is right and what is wrong. That makes me a happy go
round type of private person and part-owner. Whatever covered </FONT><FONT
size=2>communism is to be brought upon me or my properties, will be met
accordingly. The DOJ is a biased state employed marrionet, that probably not
personaly, but indeed combined with his mates, the Gov+States, will
figurerarly bleed for his actions or any by him taken actions, that
will or can at any way and at any time damage my own (intellectual) possesions
and properties, eg shares and stuff.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas<BR><A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Dismiss the
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and<BR>note the new address
change. Also for my Homepage<BR><A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:jehardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=jehardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Joseph
Ehardt</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> zaterdag 15 januari 2000
18:10</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: to be or not to be</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I don't think I have anything mixed up. More likely is that
I have read the publicly distributed Findings of Fact in DOJ vs Microsoft and
am more familiar with American law.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: I am assuming US law not to be any different than
laws elswhere. If there is to be an unsatisfactory outcome coming from this
dispute, then the European Commission has got some artillary it wants to throw
at Microsoft too. In that, laws are laws. Again, this artillary
is intervering with one's private properties and free enterprise. As such
the Shareholders Association here in the Netherlands and its sister
organisations elswhere in the EuroCommunity are ready to fully head-on
attack the EC's Commission, naturaly with endless claims to follow. Claims
that will be coming in from around the globe. Where these Governments around
the globe seems to team up (the EC has a deal with the US Fed, to await the
outcome first), more many is in the hand of shareholders. Enough to break
societies</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>and their Governments to realy go into bankruptcy. Now how
will that effect the consumer ??</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>From your comments, which are pretty far ranging, I
think you might not understand what Microsoft did with respect to Compaq. It
also did similar things with other companies. But let me return to Compaq,
because it helps to understand the facts as revealed by Microsoft's own
internal documents as made public in the trial.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: Microsoft is at liberty to end licences for their
software as they wish. So is Compaq at liberty to develope their own software.
If their to lazy or not aggressive enough or not financed enough, then
they should seek advise from professionals, as to how to be succesfull in
software too. Also Compaq is at liberty to refuse to sell Microsoft products
with their computers too, and let buying an OS up to their own customers.
Not a very clever thing to do, but its their right and choise. The negative
side of this is that Microsoft might than not sell enough of its software, and
than that would be up to Microsoft to solve. Here Microsoft has done its
homework, where Compaq </FONT><FONT size=2>enriched its executives while
they did not do their homework, eg were failures and ought to be sacked.
Just see how easy Dell surpassed the utherly simple selling techniques Compaq
enherrited from the late 80's and were the co is to log and did not
adjust. IBM for that matter is an equal example. Not all brains and a lot of
company arrogance. Good on them. Gives other users a chance to buy much
cheaper PC's with the same or in the case of IBM, much better advances and
qualities. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Question: What right does Microsoft have to demand that
Compaq not use Netscape at its personal browser? Compaq was installing
Internet Explorer on systems sold to customers, which should have made
Microsoft content, but it had adopted the internal company standard of using
Netscape which predated IE. Microsoft demanded that this end.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: All the right in the world. Simply because of the fact
that Compaq will have to meet the owners standards, in this Microsoft
standards (and not ever the other way around) if it wants to gain a legal
licensce from the owners of the software, weather this will be Microsoft or
for example, Ton Maas.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If I notice that one of my copyrighted indicators is being
sold or being mis-used, I will also sue that person/co, since I have not given
out any written permission to anyone to do so or to make any changes to it. It
is my (intellectual) property/propriety and I am the only one at right liberty
to do with it as I see fit, eg and how I pleases. If I notice for instance,
that you want to use it in a weekly magizine's software, for example for
its weekly Hot tips-section, be sure that I will take on action to prevend it
or come to some sort of arrangement, where "not using SuperChart software" for
example could be included in the license.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Question: Switching the context, if you think that Microsoft
has this right and you happen to not use Internet Explorer, do you believe
that Microsoft has the right to force you to switch to Internet Explorer, and
if you refuse, that it has the right to strip Windows off your personal
computer and electronically monitor your system to insure that you never
install Windows on your system?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Microsoft is not forcing any one to use the Internet
Exploder. You can even easy write (f.i. in VB) your own browser. Neither
is it also forcing anyone to use its Microsoft Exchange program, you know
that very dreadfull program, its to simple MsPaint or NotePad programs.
You should feel lucky that these programs come free with the OEM and OSR
versions. You are at your own liberty to use these programs or "overwrite"
with other perhaps better quality software programs. Also my ISP for instance
was also giving its users free licenses for the Netscape v1.0 to v3.0
browsers, whilst anyone using different browsers were not supported. If
Netscape had forced these tactics onto my ISP is to be seen and basicaly
irrellevent to me, since I could confince the ISP that I didn't need their
support, eg since the IE browser wasn't giving me any problems at all and
since it seemingly fitted in with my OS, as though "it was there since I
bought my PC". And any browser upgrades (note for free as well) were only
large improvements, that much that I am still running a in 1997 for the
last time installed Win95 OS version and that the latest browser
version, the IE5x, just -by itselve- made the
just-about-what-anyone-needed upgrade to and especially the by me required
upgrade to a "smaller version of Win98". I only miss out on some file
maintance tools and some extra window colouring schemes (but then again
who needs these). </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>The issue is not whether Microsoft has the right to
distribute and sell its products, nor is it that Microsoft owns the rights to
these products. No one has argued that it does not. The issue that has been
adjudicated, re-stated in different terms, is whether Microsoft had the right
to use its monopoly power to force people to buy its product when they do not
wish to do so. Microsoft was interfering with the right of individuals and
companies to freely choose other products.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: Ofcourse it has these rights since it is protecting its
property. Assume you don't have car-jacks in the States? Where the rightfull
owner of a car gets forced by a car-jacker to get out of his/hers car,
and the car-jacker takes off with the car. Now how would you feel? Having
protective tools with you, can prefent you to loose your car, eg it is
after all your rightfull pressious property, aint it? Or should we say "Please
do get in......".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>In business life its not different, therefore common
sense (that is if you/company have any) teaches you and co's to protect
your/their property(ies).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Another example: IBM has an office application suite of its
own (Lotus) that it put on computers that it builds. Do you think that
Microsoft has the right to force IBM to replace its own Lotus software with
that of Microsoft Office?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: IBM doesn't have to sell Microsoft software. They have
their own dreadfull OS, named OS2. IBM can than also install
their too simple and too basic Lotus program on their PCs too. PC that do
not work properly, an OS that doesn't work properly and an office suite that
no-one wants, nice combination to hit the All Time Highs on the stockmarkets,
ain't it? Remember too that you as shareholder are part-owner of that
company too? Unless US laws differ from elsewhere.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>There are more examples that were proven during the course
of the trial, and they are all contained in the Findings of Fact document.
Personally, I want my right protected to freely choose products and services
as guaranteed by the law. I refuse the assertion that any company has the
right to coerce me to buy its products.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: You too have the right(not the obligation) to tell the
shopkeeper that you do not want Microsoft software. It is then up to the
shopkeeper to refund you for</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>missing the OS, which since its only a US $50 cost, he most
likely will not do. Tell him that you will go to the shop next-door, and
perhaps you can pursway the salesman. Else when you are at home with your new
PC, un-install Windows. Whatever you do after is up to you, and not the
reasponsability of Microsoft, the former shopkeeper(s) or anyone lese, no it
is all in your own hands, free and at liberty to isntall other software, eg
like the above mentioned OS2, PCDOS, UNIX,LINUX, and several others that are
around. That said, good luck with it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Maybe if your information sources were not from press
accounts, then you might have a more circumspect understanding of Microsoft's
actions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TM: The whole issue here is not Microsoft, but the arrogance
of other co's and especially Governments(like said that holds the largest
amount of true monopolies)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>and their teamsters, the so called independent states. If
other co's want to be succesfull at something, then first they should
show and be an aggressive player, have intrest to develope new things, want to
change their inside attitudes, seek advise from real professionals that
can scan the company on its faults and employ the right workers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If not, then they are take-over candidates, of which
formentioned companies will then be the victum. Besides all this said, I
couldn't give a heep if IBM, Compaq or whatever co for that matter goes down,
they call it upon themselves, and it is never due to other co's that do
all in their power and make the right efforts to meet up with the above
criterea. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Joe</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jan 17 09:32:27 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA00846
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:53:13 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA01822
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:12:36 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01819
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:12:32 -0700
Received: from mail.hal-pc.org (hal-pc.org [204.52.135.1])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA02443
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:23:24 -0700 (MST)
Received: from dallas (206.180.128.122.dial-ip.hal-pc.org [206.180.128.122])
by mail.hal-pc.org (8.9.1/8.9.0) with SMTP id RAA01879
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:08:09 -0559 (CST)
From: "Ron Stockstill" <stocks@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Fib MA's and the S&P
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:07:41 -0600
Message-ID: <001601bf5fad$54907f00$7a80b4ce@xxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01BF5F7B.09F60F00"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <005e01bf5f85$30ae94a0$1464fea9@xxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=390090323-15012000>14 is
approximately 1/2 of the lunar cycle (29.2 days) and was why this particular
value was chosen for </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=390090323-15012000>RSI
according to the "delta" book.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of</B> lissen@xxxxxxx<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, January 15, 2000 12:15
PM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Fib MA's and
the S&P<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT size=2>All federal buildings that are tall enough have a 13th
floor. Few or no private sector building in the US have a 13th
floor. The floor numbers go from 12 to 14. Next time you are in a
private sector building and are on the 14th floor, you are really on the 13th
floor.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I've read that the origin of 13 being an unlucky number
stems from the last supper when 13 males shared the meal. However the
story doesn't count the servants who served the meal.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Concerning 14 being the magic number for RSI and other
oscillators; There is nothing very special about these numbers. For
particular instruments, other numbers may give better results.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>So much for magical numbers and superstitions.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lionel Issen</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
A.J. Maas
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Metastock-List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, January 15, 2000 4:39
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Fib MA's and the
S&P</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>No, not a single one of my own developped indicators
carries the 13 number in it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>****Since I have found </FONT><FONT size=2>13 to be
the unlucky number, eg this based
(like fib) on historical hypes,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>myths, </FONT><FONT
size=2>anecdotes </FONT><FONT size=2>and </FONT><FONT size=2>other
historical rhymes and riddles that over and over again have
proved</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>this view </FONT><FONT size=2>to be true, will
naturally not use 13 in financial/trade systems. Especialy when it
also</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>falls on a black(cat) Friday and I have to leave the house
noticing that the window cleaner's ladder</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>is blocking the door.****</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sub Seriously.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> T</FONT><FONT size=2>he closest I
get </FONT><FONT size=2>to is either the basic 10, the basic 14 (standard in
f.i. RSI) or the basic 15.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> Below is a partial print of
that mail that I sent you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> If your ma's + numbers in
your ma's makes you melt from their "dazzling visual
support/resistance",</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> than keep </FONT><FONT size=2>in
mind </FONT><FONT size=2>that the sequence's parts that you did used
and not left out, are </FONT><FONT size=2>so much equal
close</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> to </FONT><FONT size=2>the
decimal fractals, eg thus </FONT><FONT size=2>not fib
numbers giving your indicators their validity </FONT><FONT
size=2>but the straight</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> forward </FONT><FONT
size=2>"theached-at-any-primary-school" Decimal System's
calculations systematics </FONT><FONT size=2>and
methods.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> Next up, you believers,
are going to bring Van Gogh's used painting methods into the trading
attributes</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> and patterns as well. I can
see it already in front of me, "the Van Gogh price crunching
patterns tell</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> this and that bla bla
bla".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>End Sub.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Dino, Leno and Nino</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I can just imagine you in these places standing there with
your fib-calculator in your hand, timing when</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>the breaks/resting pauzes </FONT><FONT size=2>were
due.</FONT><FONT size=2></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sure you don't have them mixed with the
famous TV-presentators, cartoon-heros and Hollywood
stars/singers?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </FONT></FONT><BR>Regards,<BR>Ton
Maas<BR><A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Dismiss
the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and<BR>note the new
address change. Also for my Homepage<BR><A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT
size=2>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Tho, I am getting myself programmed to act according to a
Buy/Sell indicator.<BR>This then can either be the ELWAVE or another
indicator which I am currently testing within<BR> Excel (and as yet
cannot be fully implemented in a program like Metatstock).<BR>I have already
been testing this for over a year now and this indicator will be a<BR>plain
On/Off indicator(biwave) with signal crossings of and made by a current
positive<BR>Trend indication and a current negative Trend
indication.<BR><BR>A workable duplicate -tho this one is based on
LinReg and slightly later signaling- is the<BR>following biwave
"TM - RALLY Meter - LJ2"
indicator:<BR><BR>If(((LinearReg(C,14)/Ref(LinearReg(C,14),-9))-1)>-0.002,+1,-1)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>{Indicator + formula are copyrighted by Ton Maas - MsIRB -
the Netherlands}<BR><BR>This is very well to be used with the "TM - RALLY
Meter - Osc" indicator(also based on<BR>LinReg) wich I have mailed to you
before: <BR><BR>(LinearReg(C,14)/Ref(LinearReg(C,14),-14))-1<BR>{as the
trigger overlay use with a smoothed version, eg a SMA5.<BR><FONT
size=2>Indicator + formula are copyrighted by Ton Maas - MsIRB - the
Netherlands}<BR></FONT><BR>Hope this all answered your mails questions and
that you have been able to ride the<BR>S&P's restanding move upwards
with for you the required $ gains,<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Ton
Maas<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT
size=2>============================================<BR></DIV></FONT>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A href="mailto:kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx"; title=kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Steve
Karnish</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> ; <A
href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>RTList</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> vrijdag 14 januari 2000
5:06</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: Fib MA's and the
S&P</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ton,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Sorry, it took a while to respond. I
was working the Ag Exposition in Spokane, WA. I hung a sign in the
convention arena, danced a monkey around on a string, and while the crowd
was being misdirected, I lifted all their wallets.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The fibonacci moving averages are posted for
pure amusement (you know, just like the monkey). I have a real
simple mind and I'm easily fooled. I'm totally amused by dropping a
"fib" moving average template on a chart and seeing all the little "coinky
dinkies". Ton, I like these averages. I think they're more fun
than 10, 20, 50, 100 or whatever makes you giggle. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I make my living (the wallet stealing
part) by employing a consistent, simple, mechanical system to all the
markets that I trade. This "system" features momentum oscillators. And, Oh
God,</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2> it has one or two or three (dare I
say) "fibonacci numbers" imbedded in the damn formula. "I mean the
shame of it all!" Fib numbers violating the integrity of a sound
momentum oscillator. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Ton, you must have missed my stirring
historical review of Fibonacci's trip to Egypt, his lovers, and other
antidotes. It was all related to me in a bar in Detroit (circa 1981)
by one of his descended. I forget if it was Leno, Dino, or Nino
Fibonacci (three brothers who you want on your team when the
chairs start flying). If anyone still has that post, please
share it with Ton. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Meanwhile, I'll be mechanically trading for a
friends, relatives, and a couple of guys whose names end with a
vowel. And Ton, shame on you if you use 13 in any of your
formulas. Didn't you send me a Linear Regression Oscillator that was
peppered with the number 13. Honestly, Ton, you should be ashamed of
your behavior!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Dancing the monkey on a string,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Steve Karnish<BR>Cedar Creek Trading<BR><A
href="http://www.cedarcreektrading.com";>http://www.cedarcreektrading.com</A></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Jan 17 09:32:55 2000
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA02547
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:43:32 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA02479
for metastock-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:57:05 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA02476
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:57:01 -0700
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA02480
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 15 Jan 2000 17:07:53 -0700 (MST)
Received: from escom ([195.121.216.86]) by smtp02.wxs.nl
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with SMTP id AAA3757;
Sun, 16 Jan 2000 00:52:09 +0100
Message-ID: <000b01bf5fb3$f001d5a0$LocalHost@xxxxx>
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <52.521ad6fb.25a632e3@xxxxxxx> <38790080.61685384@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <001001bf5a05$75f21940$0bd879c3@xxxxx> <36a8e699.1525093@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <004801bf5aa6$395c8960$16db79c3@xxxxx> <36b1e43a.5278797@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <049e01bf5bca$11bd4000$28dc79c3@xxxxx> <3881f08b.347117298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <005d01bf5e14$bd4c14e0$d7de79c3@xxxxx> <387f7589.533169275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: how to improve generalization in system optimization
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 00:54:24 +0100
Organization: Ms-IRB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01BF5FBC.3C296760"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2722.2800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Rudolf,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Install the T-Clock program(TCLEX121.EXE) and than get back to
me with the pictures.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen";>http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Below a picture showing the "extended with date"
Windows' clock and my settings for this utillity.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Once installed, you cannot do without. That happens to me at
work, when asked for the date, and</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>now with your scripts VBA problem, 'automatically' I am
assuming that you have the date visuality</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>as well.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Have cc-ed this mail to the List as well, for others to
enjoy.</FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><FONT size=2>Regards,<BR>Ton Maas<BR><A
href="mailto:ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR>Dismiss the
".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and<BR>note the new address
change. Also for my Homepage<BR><A
href="http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas";>http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><IMG align=baseline alt="" border=0 hspace=0
src="cid:000501bf5fb3$d9f107e0$LocalHost@xxxxx";></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TClockEx<BR>Copyright (c) 1998 Dale Nurden<BR>All Rights
Reserved</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Version 1.2.1</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><BR>This program is Freeware. Please use and distribute with
my pleasure!<BR>See the accompanying help file, TCLOCKEX.HLP, for conditions of
use and<BR>the disclaimer message.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><BR>TClockEx enhances the standard Windows 95/98/NT clock that
is built into<BR>the taskbar, providing the ability to display the time AND date
in any<BR>format you choose.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>For more information, visit <A
href="http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen";>http://users.iafrica.com/d/da/dalen</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To contact the author, send email to <A
href="mailto:dalen@xxxxxxxxxxx";>dalen@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> or <A
href="mailto:dalen@xxxxxxxxxx";>dalen@xxxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If email makes you nervous, send snail mail to:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Dale Nurden<BR>14 Willow Crescent<BR>Pinetown 3610<BR>South
Africa</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>TO INSTALL THIS PROGRAM...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If you downloaded the full version (TCLEX121.EXE) with
install/uninstall<BR>support, just run the file you downloaded and follow the
prompts.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>If you downloaded the reduced version (TCLEX121.ZIP)
without<BR>install/uninstall support, unzip the file you downloaded into a
suitable<BR>folder, then run TCLOCKEX.EXE.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Note that the only difference between the reduced and full
versions is<BR>that the full version includes install/uninstall support.
Otherwise<BR>they're identical.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Dale Nurden<BR>September 1998<BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Example of TClockEx Properties<BR> <BR>Date/Time
Format<BR>Date: Show
date
Show date first<BR> Custom format:
ddd-d MMM<BR>Time: Show time
<BR> Custom format: HH:mm</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT
size=2>======================================================</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>----- Original Message ----- </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>From: rudolf stricker <<A
href="mailto:rst@xxxxxxxxxxx";>rst@xxxxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>To: A.J. Maas <<A
href="mailto:anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx";>anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx</A>></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Sent: vrijdag 14 januari 2000 20:38</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Subject: Re: how to improve generalization in system
optimization</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR><FONT size=2>Hi Ton,<BR><BR>thank you much for your
engagement on my Excel / clock problem.<BR><BR>On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 22:14:47
+0100, you wrote:<BR><BR>>Just send me a couple of example pictures of the
clock-results of the "wrongdoer".<BR>><BR>>This should not be that
difficult if you have a program like Word/Excel to Paste to.<BR>><BR>>-
ALT+PRINTSCREEN is a picture of the active window<BR>>- PRINTSCREEN is a
picture of the screen(wide)<BR>>- These pictures should
show:<BR>>
a. - first picture the proper
display<BR>>
b. - then second pictur the incorrect display<BR>>- then just Paste
clipboard contents into a Word or Excel file.<BR>>- Save files as a GIF file
to disk<BR>>- then Insert or Attach (in)to OE50 mail.<BR><BR>I do not
understand, what kind of screen shots might be helpful to<BR>identify the
wrongdoer.<BR><BR>Using Win98, I normally see only Windows' time-of-day (not the
date)<BR>at the screen. The present date is only indicated, if I put the
cursor<BR>at the time-of-day shown. If the correct date is set and I start
my<BR>system test VBA code, I can test the correct date via moving the<BR>cursor
at the appropriate place.<BR><BR>When the VBA code is running for some time,
working at the different<BR>Excel sheets, I test the date again by moving the
cursor<BR>appropriately, and the date has changed. But I cannot see the
exact<BR>changing process of the date to get an idea, which part of the
VBA<BR>code or which Excel calculation might be responsible for the
erroneous<BR>date change.<BR><BR>This way I'm not sure, what kind of screen
shots could be helpful to<BR>identify the wrongdoer. -Or is ther any capability
to display<BR>continuously the (changing) date? - Any hint?<BR><BR>mfg
rudolf stricker<BR>| Disclaimer: The views of this user are strictly his
own.<BR></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>
Attachment Converted: "f:\eudora\attach\tclock.gif"
|