[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Weekly Pick



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2614.3401" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>&nbsp;All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</SPAN>I took a long look at the industry sectors and came to the conclusion 
that the Internet and Telecom Equipment sectors were the two strongest sectors 
for the moment.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The have good 
representation in the Internet Sector with AOL, which is a pure Internet play 
and CSCO and SCH, which both have strong ties to the Internet.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>However, I don&#8217;t have any Telecom 
Equipment stocks and I&#8217;d like to add one.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>However, before I can do that I have to free up cash by closing one of my 
existing positions.</DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</SPAN>The question is, has one of my existing stocks performed poorly enough 
that I should close it in favor of a Telecom Equipment stock?<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>I think the answer is yes, PPE hasn&#8217;t 
performed that well and the gaming sector is cooling off.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>PPE has moved sideways for a month and 
is now right at the bottom of its Short Term Up Trend Channel (STUTC).<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>On the other hand, I&#8217;d hate to replace 
it now and then watch it bounce off the bottom of the channel and take off.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>I think the answer is to wait in the 
wings with my Telecom Equipment stock selection &#8211; Pairgain Technologies 
(PAIR).<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The idea is to replace PPE 
with PAIR when, and if, PPE does drop through the bottom of its STUTC.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>That should happen in the next few days 
if we don&#8217;t get an up move.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</SPAN>PAIR at 13.19 is in a STUTC with the top at 16 1/8 and the bottom at 11 
½.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>It set an all time high of 43 ¼ 
on 1/23/97 then went into a multiyear down trend to a bottom of 6 on 
10/7/98.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>From there it climbed 
slowly and finally broke out of the Long Term Down Trend Channel in late April 
of this year.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>After that break out, 
it fell back to the bottom of the Intermediate Term Up Trend Channel (ITUTC) 
formed from the 10/7/98 low and set another low of 8 on 8/10/99.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>I formed the current STUTC from that low 
to a September high.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>It just fell 
back into the bottom half of that STUTC Friday and looks like it is at a good 
entry point for a stock in a strong industry group.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The long term Tema StochRSI has been 
positive for over a month and the short term Tema StochRSI just turned 
positive.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The fundamentals are OK 
with the price/sales a little high at 4.18, the debt/equity low at 0.01, and the 
5 yr av. Revenue growth at 35%, and the 5 yr. av. EPS growth at 22%.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; See 
chart at &nbsp;<A 
href="http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/";>http://www.geocities.com/jimginva/</A></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">JimG&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 
</SPAN></P></FONT></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Sun Nov 07 22:38:16 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24106
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:40:29 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA30565
	for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:18:12 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA30561
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:18:09 -0700
Received: from web119.yahoomail.com (web119.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.120])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA10510
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:23:07 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <19991108061831.8881.rocketmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from [203.197.114.46] by web119.yahoomail.com; Sun, 07 Nov 1999 22:18:31 PST
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:18:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Rajat Bose <rajatkbose@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RegCleaner
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1681692777-942041911=:7495"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

<x-html><P>Hi Ton,</P>
<P>I liked the review of the Registry Cleaner but could not download the attachments despite several attempts. </P>
<P>Could you give the site address from where the Registry Cleaner can be downloaded?</P>
<P>Thanks in advance</P>
<P>Rajat</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P><BR><BR>
<br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>Bid and sell for free at Yahoo! Auctions.<br></x-html>From ???@??? Sun Nov 07 22:48:16 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA24251
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:50:04 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA30769
	for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:26:31 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA30762
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:26:28 -0700
Received: from web119.yahoomail.com (web119.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.120])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA10518
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:31:26 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <19991108062654.9694.rocketmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from [203.197.114.46] by web119.yahoomail.com; Sun, 07 Nov 1999 22:26:54 PST
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:26:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Rajat Bose <rajatkbose@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RegCleaner
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1804289383-942042414=:9618"
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

<x-html><P>Ton, Frank et al,</P>
<P>Sorry, there was some problem with my inbox. I have already got the web-site address from Frank's post. </P>
<P>Now, I have got all the mails and have also downloaded the software from the link provided by Frank for RegClean 2.1</P>
<P>Thanks anyway.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Rajat</P><BR><BR>
<br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>Bid and sell for free at Yahoo! Auctions.<br></x-html>From ???@??? Mon Nov 08 06:52:39 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA25416
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 8 Nov 1999 01:11:20 -0800
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA31261
	for metastock-outgoing; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:48:12 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA31253
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:48:09 -0700
From: ROSOW@xxxxxxx
Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA10580
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 23:53:07 -0700 (MST)
Received: from ROSOW@xxxxxxx
	by imo12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v23.6.) id uPMEa09451 (4252);
	Mon, 8 Nov 1999 01:38:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <0.98d68a0d.2557c9cb@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 01:38:03 EST
Subject: Re: Two reasons to hold sugar
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
CC: kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 250
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

In a message dated 11/08/1999 1:19:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
kernish@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< Gee, can any of you technicians spell d i v e r g e n c e?   >>
I thought I did in my last post which was
"Divergences - Lenny"

Steve - Thanks for your posts - Lenny