[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Beta Test Program



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Has the RTD beta server been permanently shut down? It has 
been responding with "HOST CONNECTION FAILED" since last Friday, which means 
that the last update I received was last Thursday night's download. Why is there 
no feedback answer to this problem, and why do you think that paying subscribers 
are going to be happy with the new "nonservice"? It's a surreal way to respond 
to people who are cooperating in an attempt to improve the service of all 
regular customers.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Joe</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Mon Sep 13 20:05:17 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
	by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA18201
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:22:21 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA09758
	for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:05:59 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA09753
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:05:56 -0600
Received: from smtp1.erols.com (smtp1.erols.com [207.172.3.234])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA01838
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:48:33 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from erols.com (208-58-192-132.s132.tnt9.lnhva.md.dialup.rcn.com [208.58.192.132])
	by smtp1.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02222
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:34:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <37DD9850.54A79601@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 20:35:28 -0400
From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Off site backup
References: <006201befe43$df68bdc0$0100a8c0@xxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:   

John Manasco wrote:

> Does anyone know of a good, preferably web based, off site data storage
> facility?

Haven't actually used this site myself, so this is not a recommendation.  Just
heard about it recently:

http://www.i-FileZone.com/

Good luck with Floyd.

Mark Scheier

> I seem to remember Guy Tann doing backups to an offsite facility.
>
> Please hurry, I have a hurricane on my doorstep.
>
> John Manasco