[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Meta's fib tool



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Perhaps, but their markets are somewhat different.   Metastock does a better
job than Supercharts, but as you can see from this list, many users grow out of
its limitations and then feel forced to move on to Tradestation.   Equis
doesn't realize this, but this gives them bad press, and causes many new
traders to begin with a software that has better upgrade path, namely Omega.
They are tantalized by Tradestation, but start out with Supercharts.   If you
start out with Metastock, where do you go to stay with Equis?   You don't.
You consider leaving instead.

It seems to me that they have come so close in so many ways not to take the
extra thought into their development path.

In any case, good luck with your trading....

Scheier

Lionel Issen wrote:

> Mark:
>
> I've come to the sad conclusion that Equis doesn't really care and that
> they think they have an exclusive franchise (that is franchise as Warren
> Buffett defines it).  If Omega provided better service manuals and online
> help, they would take away Equis' market.
>
> Lionel Issen
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
>
> > I shouldn't be surprised to learn this deficiency has been posted to this
> list
> > before.   I'm a fairly new member.    Once about 2 years ago I got
> someone on the
> > line at Equis and tried to discuss this issue.   It was clearly an
> example of being
> > unable to think outside the box.   The box being defined by the lowest
> common
> > denominator of established technical analysis tools.
> >
> > If Equis would start thinking in terms of Open Architecture instead of
> Predefined
> > Terms, they just might be able to leap into the market opportunity left
> open by bug
> > ridden bench of TradeStation's new releases.   Is anybody listening?
> >
> > Mark Scheier
> >
> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> >
> > > Like noted before on this list, I would also prefer to see
> > > a user definable Retracement Tool, replacing the irrelivant
> > > clumpsy Retracement-tool that is currently available in v6xx.
> > >
> > > For my preferences I would like to enable it to give lines @  the
> > > Decimal-levels (-0-12,5-25-33.3-50-66.7-75-87.5-100+112.5+125+
> > > 133.3+150 etc.), and having "optional" checkboxes (eg to switch
> > > some of the lines on and off, from time to time, for better chart
> readability).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and
> > > note the new address change. Also for my Homepage
> > > http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: Metalist <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 1999 20:28
> > > Subject: Meta's fib tool
> > >
> > > > Concerning limitations of the Metastock fibonacci retracement
> > > > tool.   It seems to use these levels: 68%, 50%, 38%, and 25% (75%
> > > > from the other end).    Is anyone aware of way to user-modify this
> > > > tool?--as in a way to change the 75% to 78% etc.    Has anyone
> > > > spoken to designers at Equis about bringing this tool up to date? --
> > > > with the work and software of Bryce Gilmore, Robert Miner, Tom
> > > > Joseph and about a half dozen other of their industry competitors?
> > > > --or is there maybe just a trick I'm unaware of in the latest or
> > > > soon-to-be released versions.
> > > >
> > > > Mark Scheier
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >