|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: Lionel Issen <lissen@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
> Mark:
>
>
> I've come to the sad conclusion that Equis doesn't really care and that
> they think they have an exclusive franchise (that is franchise as Warren
> Buffett defines it). If Omega provided better service manuals and online
> help, they would take away Equis' market.
>
But they don't! I'm running both Tradestation 2000i and Metastock, for
different reasons. Omega has some of the poorest customer service in the
world. They simply don't give a damn. As for their manuals, I refer to the
Metastock manual for clarification of an indicator if I need it. Yes we
bitch and moan about Equis but their customer service is first rate and they
do care about their customers.
I'm using Tradestation because their EZ language is far superior to
Metastock and their charts can accept 50 data feeds making it easy to
develop multi symbol systems and cross market systems. I use Metastock for
charting, displaying indicators, and scanning the markets. Their charting
capabilities are superior to Tradestations and Metastock doesn't crash my
computer like Tradestation does. When Equis catches up Omega will go bust.
John Manasco
> Lionel Issen
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Meta's fib tool
>
>
> > I shouldn't be surprised to learn this deficiency has been posted to
this
> list
> > before. I'm a fairly new member. Once about 2 years ago I got
> someone on the
> > line at Equis and tried to discuss this issue. It was clearly an
> example of being
> > unable to think outside the box. The box being defined by the lowest
> common
> > denominator of established technical analysis tools.
> >
> > If Equis would start thinking in terms of Open Architecture instead of
> Predefined
> > Terms, they just might be able to leap into the market opportunity left
> open by bug
> > ridden bench of TradeStation's new releases. Is anybody listening?
> >
> > Mark Scheier
> >
> > "A.J. Maas" wrote:
> >
> > > Like noted before on this list, I would also prefer to see
> > > a user definable Retracement Tool, replacing the irrelivant
> > > clumpsy Retracement-tool that is currently available in v6xx.
> > >
> > > For my preferences I would like to enable it to give lines @ the
> > > Decimal-levels (-0-12,5-25-33.3-50-66.7-75-87.5-100+112.5+125+
> > > 133.3+150 etc.), and having "optional" checkboxes (eg to switch
> > > some of the lines on and off, from time to time, for better chart
> readability).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ton Maas
> > > ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and
> > > note the new address change. Also for my Homepage
> > > http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: scheier <scheier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: Metalist <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: dinsdag 7 september 1999 20:28
> > > Subject: Meta's fib tool
> > >
> > > > Concerning limitations of the Metastock fibonacci retracement
> > > > tool. It seems to use these levels: 68%, 50%, 38%, and 25% (75%
> > > > from the other end). Is anyone aware of way to user-modify this
> > > > tool?--as in a way to change the 75% to 78% etc. Has anyone
> > > > spoken to designers at Equis about bringing this tool up to date? --
> > > > with the work and software of Bryce Gilmore, Robert Miner, Tom
> > > > Joseph and about a half dozen other of their industry competitors?
> > > > --or is there maybe just a trick I'm unaware of in the latest or
> > > > soon-to-be released versions.
> > > >
> > > > Mark Scheier
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>
|