|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=130292821-25081999>Well i
would send in the $8 just to get now, you dont have to install it now. For
the price you are paying i would upgrade to 2000, it is completely automatic to
install, and thier are some enhancements to excel and the
web</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130292821-25081999></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=130292821-25081999>Brad</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On
Behalf Of </B>Daniel Martinez<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, August 25, 1999 4:19
PM<BR><B>To:</B> metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: beyond
Metastock - Install MS Office Pro 2000 Upgrade?<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>To Group,
<BR>about Excel 97 & 2000: I only recently purchased/installed MS
Office Pro 97 on July 1. Before that I used Corel Pro 7 with Quattro Pro
7. I was forced to add MS Office Pro 97 because Quattro "Pro" 7 is not
OLE2 capable. I was able to purchase MS Office Pro 97, full retail, for
a total of $75 at EBAY which was an outstanding deal (it was $520 at most
retailers).
<P>I also was able to get, direct from MicroSoft, the MS Office Pro 2000,
upgrade version, for $8. Since I spent so much time installing 97 and
downloading/upgrading various components, I don't really want to install the
2000 right now (I'm actually a bit tired of installing software).
<P>Does anyone know how much of a difference there is between Excel 97 and
2000? Is it worth my upgrading right now? Does Excel 2000 have
enough additional capabilities, especially with VBA, to warrant my spending
another 12 hours (with additional downloads for patches) upgrading?
<P>Daniel. <BR> <BR>
<P>Walter Lake wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE="CITE">Hi Guy and Daniel
<P>"... For most MetaStock users, I believe the MS Excel/MetaStock combo is
<BR>plenty. Most users, myself included, don't know how to program in
Visual <BR>C++. It would also be time consuming. ..."
<P>The major problem that Metastockers have in moving to additional programs
<BR>... whether they be Excel or VB or Visual C++ ... is how to use it in
their <BR>trading.
<P>Guy identified specific purposes that he has. As a spread trader I have
<BR>specific uses for Excel etc.
<P>No one has written an article on the uses of Excel for trading and
universe <BR>of stocks screening.
<P>We shall all have to wait and see what direction Metastock is going in
with <BR>version 7.0. Then the future will be a little clearer.
<P>As discussed earlier ... reluctance to rely on a retail version of a
program <BR>is a reason why many traders turn to programming.
<P>Another reason ... is the tremendous bias the retail program puts on your
<BR>trading thinking / mind set. I have to remind myself daily that
technical <BR>analysis is only one piece of the puzzle.
<P>Each trader has to find his own market or structural inefficiency to make
<BR>money in. Going there is often off the beaten pathway with all of
<BR>existential terrors of emptiness and nothing-ness and unknowing-ness as
your <BR>friend.
<P>Happy trails
<P>Walter</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Aug 25 16:27:42 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA06382
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:28:44 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA13970
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:04:32 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA13967
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:04:29 -0600
Received: from mail.rdc1.pa.home.com (imail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [24.2.5.66])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA04217
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:54:59 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from frog ([24.3.111.42]) by mail.rdc1.pa.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP
id <19990825222403.IYVA24014.mail.rdc1.pa.home.com@xxxx>
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 15:24:03 -0700
Message-ID: <002701beef48$9f745e40$2a6f0318@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "af" <aflood@xxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <000801beee24$be40be60$fb906395@xxxxxx> <37C44FBF.95994241@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: beyond Metastock - Install MS Office Pro 2000 Upgrade?
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 18:24:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01BEEF27.184AF080"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Daniel,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Personally I went ahead with the upgrade to Office
2000. Excel was becoming somewhat unstable with larger spreadsheets that
had crosslinks to other large spreadsheets. The upgrade to 2000 fixed
this. But beyond this, there are no ground breaking changes. There
are some differences but they are small.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Aongus</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
Daniel Martinez
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
href="mailto:metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";
title=metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, August 25, 1999 4:19
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: beyond Metastock - Install
MS Office Pro 2000 Upgrade?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>To Group, <BR>about Excel 97 & 2000: I only recently
purchased/installed MS Office Pro 97 on July 1. Before that I used Corel
Pro 7 with Quattro Pro 7. I was forced to add MS Office Pro 97 because
Quattro "Pro" 7 is not OLE2 capable. I was able to purchase MS Office
Pro 97, full retail, for a total of $75 at EBAY which was an outstanding deal
(it was $520 at most retailers).
<P>I also was able to get, direct from MicroSoft, the MS Office Pro 2000,
upgrade version, for $8. Since I spent so much time installing 97 and
downloading/upgrading various components, I don't really want to install the
2000 right now (I'm actually a bit tired of installing software).
<P>Does anyone know how much of a difference there is between Excel 97 and
2000? Is it worth my upgrading right now? Does Excel 2000 have
enough additional capabilities, especially with VBA, to warrant my spending
another 12 hours (with additional downloads for patches) upgrading?
<P>Daniel. <BR> <BR>
<P>Walter Lake wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE="CITE">Hi Guy and Daniel
<P>"... For most MetaStock users, I believe the MS Excel/MetaStock combo is
<BR>plenty. Most users, myself included, don't know how to program in
Visual <BR>C++. It would also be time consuming. ..."
<P>The major problem that Metastockers have in moving to additional programs
<BR>... whether they be Excel or VB or Visual C++ ... is how to use it in
their <BR>trading.
<P>Guy identified specific purposes that he has. As a spread trader I have
<BR>specific uses for Excel etc.
<P>No one has written an article on the uses of Excel for trading and
universe <BR>of stocks screening.
<P>We shall all have to wait and see what direction Metastock is going in
with <BR>version 7.0. Then the future will be a little clearer.
<P>As discussed earlier ... reluctance to rely on a retail version of a
program <BR>is a reason why many traders turn to programming.
<P>Another reason ... is the tremendous bias the retail program puts on your
<BR>trading thinking / mind set. I have to remind myself daily that
technical <BR>analysis is only one piece of the puzzle.
<P>Each trader has to find his own market or structural inefficiency to make
<BR>money in. Going there is often off the beaten pathway with all of
<BR>existential terrors of emptiness and nothing-ness and unknowing-ness as
your <BR>friend.
<P>Happy trails
<P>Walter</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Wed Aug 25 16:37:30 1999
Return-Path: <majordom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from listserv.equis.com (listserv.equis.com [204.246.137.2])
by purebytes.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA06498
for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:37:42 -0700
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA13964
for metastock-outgoing; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:04:08 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA13961
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:04:05 -0600
Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60])
by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA04213
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:54:35 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from escom ([195.121.181.151]) by smtp02.wxs.nl
(Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with SMTP id AAA2845
for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:40:43 +0200
Message-ID: <000d01beef4a$a7c6e200$97b579c3@xxxxx>
From: "A.J. Maas" <anthmaas@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Metastock-List" <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Diamonds + Fractal Retracements
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:38:23 +0200
Organization: Ms-IRB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Status:
(ST-IMT) System signals :
Index - Old (report per 990823) - Current (per 990824)
------- -------- -------------
10yr/yield ECB €uro Rate - (before 990507)Negative -unchanged, Negative
10yr/yield Japan ¥en Rate - 990617 -Negative -unchanged, Negative
10yr/yield US $ollar Rate - 990616 -Negative -unchanged, Negative
AEX - 990818 -Positive -unchanged, Positive
AEX-Volume - 990802-Negative -unchanged, Negative
DAX 30 - 990820-Positive -unchanged, Positive
DJ EURO STOXX 50 - 990820-Positive -unchanged, Positive
Dow Indu - 990817 -Positive -unchanged, Positive
Dow Transp - 990721 -Negative -unchanged, Negative
Dow Utils - 990624 -Negative -unchanged, Negative
HangSeng - 990720 -Negative -990824-Positive ***
Nikkei 225 - 990820-Positive -unchanged, Positive
SP500 - 990823-Positive -unchanged, Positive
***=adjusted (in todays report)
(for explanation see previous mail dated 990818)
Regards,
Ton Maas
ms-irb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dismiss the ".nospam" bit (including the dot) when replying and
note the new address change. Also for my Homepage
http://home.planet.nl/~anthmaas
|