[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Quotes Plus



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

<x-html><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2></FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff 
face=Arial size=2>Daniel,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2>depends what your trying to do.&nbsp;&nbsp; Its far easier to scan 10K 
securities in QP than in MS.&nbsp; You cannot scan funnymentals in 
Metastock.&nbsp; Metastocks formula language is more powerful than QP from some 
types of scans. QP is also much faster.&nbsp; Lots of trade offs.&nbsp; everyone 
should do what pleases them.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2>Exporting 1000's of symbols each day via batch file is quick and 
painless.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=720432113-06041999><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial 
size=2>Sean</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader><FONT face="Times New Roman" 
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]<B>On Behalf Of</B> Daniel 
Martinez<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 06, 1999 4:43 AM<BR><B>To:</B> 
metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Quotes Plus<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>I 
would like to use exported data, but then I'd have to export 1,000's of symbols 
each day.&nbsp; Also, I'd have to keep track of symbol changes, etc...&nbsp; 
While there may be an advantage to using QP Scans, MetaStock is MUCH better than 
QPChart. 
<P>Daniel. <BR>&nbsp; 
<P>&quot;d.orlow&quot; wrote: 
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE = CITE>&nbsp;<FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT 
    color=#800080><FONT size=+0>Just as a follow-up to Daniel's post about QP, I 
    am running the following system with no hangups or 
    freezing:</FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT 
    color=#800080>Abit LX6 motherboard</FONT></FONT><FONT 
    face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#800080><FONT 
    size=+0>PentiumII-233</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT 
    color=#800080><FONT size=+0>Win95</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT 
    face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#800080><FONT size=+0>Metastock6.5 (not 
    &quot;the patch&quot;)</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT 
    color=#800080><FONT size=+0>Diamond FirePro 8meg 
    AGP</FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT 
    color=#800080><FONT size=+0>Download with cable modem takes ~20 seconds, to 
    update my ~2500 files takes ~2 minutes. I use the exported Metastock format, 
    and not the virtual QP format. My scans are MUCH MUCH faster in the QP scan 
    program than they are in the Metastock Exploration, and I like the fact that 
    the QP scan can create a directory which then puts the results in that 
    directory. I merely change the dayname of the directory each day, and I can 
    easily go back to the results which came out on the scan of, for example, 
    last Wed. Great feature!</FONT></FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT 
    face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT color=#800080><FONT size=+0>The one question 
    which remains.......will QP be able to work with Metastock come 1/1/00? 
    Equis is being very tight-lipped about their secret 
    formula......or......should I say Reuters?</FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT 
    face="Comic Sans MS"><FONT 
color=#800080>Debra</FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
</x-html>From ???@??? Tue Apr 06 11:00:51 1999
Received: from listserv.equis.com (204.246.137.2)
	by mail02.rapidsite.net (RS ver 1.0.2) with SMTP id 788
	for <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue,  6 Apr 1999 13:06:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordom@xxxxxxxxx)
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA11966
	for metastock-outgoing; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 23:38:40 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.equis.com: majordom set sender to owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx using -f
Received: from freeze.metastock.com (freeze.metastock.com [204.246.137.5])
	by listserv.equis.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA11961
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 23:38:38 -0600
Received: from hal-pc.org (hal-pc.org [204.52.135.1])
	by freeze.metastock.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA02236
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:31:02 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from mslomka (206.180.128.179.dial-ip.hal-pc.org [206.180.128.179])
	by hal-pc.org (8.9.1/8.9.0) with SMTP id KAA10837
	for <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:19:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Myron B.  [Bruce] Slomka" <mslomka@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: All 89 requested copies of my Enhanced Raff Channels Expert sent
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 10:21:53 -0500
Message-ID: <000201be8041$331fbc60$b380b4ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To: <24FA77225FA5D111869F0000C025B6F27A416C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Loop-Detect: 1
X-UIDL: 998e9bcf84deeb7d35cd9670054c2e72.01



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Equis Support
Sent: Monday, April 05, 1999 8:12 PM
To: 'MetaStock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: All 89 requested copies of my Enhanced Raff Channels Expert
sent


Dear List Users

I've just a few minutes ago managed to send out all 89 copies of my
Expert that were so far requested. 

If you have questions about my Expert or my article, please direct them
either to OnWord@xxxxxxxx or rwhman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  If any of you
requested my Expert and did not receive it, please send me a note to one
of these two e-mail addresses.

My best to each of you,

Robert B. McKinnon

I note your willingness to share your Raff channel expertese.

I would appreciate a copy if it would not be an imposition at this time.

Thank you!!!

Bruce Slomka