|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Al
My memory is aided by flashbacks triggered by those recreational
pharmaceuticals that were being passed around back then.
If I'm not mistaken, that's when we did the most creative developing ever.
<G>
Guy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 1999 12:46 PM
To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
Guy,
1999-1969 =30 years. Hm-m-m-m. Wish my memory was that good.
Calls to mind when the great grandson showed the new born to the 92 year
old great grandfather. The gandfathers response was, "As best I can
recollect, it's a girl."
Please!! No flames. Anticipating a slow weekend, and still bleeding from
Friday's action in MER and SLB.
Al Taglavore
----------
> From: Guy Tann <grt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
> Date: Friday, March 19, 1999 9:45 PM
>
> Bob
>
> OK, I understand that it's only $29 more. My question is, what do I get
for
> the $29? It's a little hard to sell me something if I can't see it,
touch
> it, feel it, oops, sorry, thinking about something else... Those 60s
> flashbacks are truly realistic. <G>
>
> Guy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bob Jagow
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 12:10 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
>
>
> No free page, but print subscribers pay only $29/yr for the bundle --
> Barron's, Smart Money, and WSJ.
>
> bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy Tann
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 1999 10:55 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
>
>
> Bob
>
> Tried to look at it but it's subscription only. I'll try to see if they
> have a free page somewhere.
>
> Thanks
>
> Guy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bob Jagow
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 1999 9:47 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
>
>
> The Online MarketLab now has most everything, Guy.
>
> http://interactive.wsj.com/documents/mlab-dj_half_hour.htm
>
> Bob
>
> bjagow@xxxxxxx <mailto:bjagow@xxxxxxx>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy Tann
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 11:19 PM
> To: metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
>
>
> Al
>
> Per my other post (which I haven't seen posted here yet, BTW) check out
page
> C3 of the Money & Investing Section of the Wall Street Journal. In the
> table (The Dow Jones Averages Hour by Hour) they post both the
theoretical
> and the actual. The open and the close remain the same in both cases.
We
> hand post the actual from this table in our own data base. I'm not sure
if
> anybody might provide it. I think Prophet might have it, but since I
> couldn't get it to work, I really don't remember.
>
> Guy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-metastock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Al Taglavore
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 1:36 PM
> To: MetaStock List Group
> Subject: Guy Tann: Data Vendors
>
>
> Guy, HOLD EVERYTHING!! I recently made a post on Primate as a
satisfactory
> data vendor. Please read a response to an inquiry I made today. I ask
> this LIST, am I missing something? My broker demands real money. Gosh,
I
> wish my losss were "theoretical".
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Taglavore <altag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Primate Software <support@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 10:01 AM
> Subject: Data Errors
>
> >According to the data I have downloaded from QuoteMonkey, the DJIA
crossed
> >10,000 on 3/12, 3/15, and 3/16. Did I miss something? With the world
> >looking for Dow 10,000, I would have thought that your office would have
> >caught this immediately. I have previously asked about
> >discrepancies/omissions and have received no reply. What is the correct
> >procedure to get flawed data corrected? How/When do you verify and
> correct
> >the data you have sent? A prompt reply would be very much appreciated.
> >
> >Al Taglavore
> PRIMATE RESPONSE:
>
> Al, I thought I explained this before? If not, you are looking at
> theoretical data for the highs and lows NOT actual. If you look at
> Investors Daily they also use theoretical. What it is- if all 30 Dow
> stocks
> trade at their highs or lows you would get these numbers.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
|